[SCHEDULE 13G] ZKH Group Limited American SEC Filing
RAYS Capital Partners Ltd reported beneficial ownership of 251,718,110 Class A ordinary shares of ZKH Group Ltd, representing 5.5% of the class. The filing states RAYS holds sole voting and dispositive power for all shares reported and identifies the filer as an investment adviser organized in Hong Kong. The statement certifies the position is held in the ordinary course of business and not for the purpose of changing or influencing control of the issuer. Contact and principal office addresses for both issuer and filer are provided in the filing.
- Clear disclosure of a >5% stake (251,718,110 shares, 5.5%), meeting regulatory transparency requirements
- Sole voting and dispositive power is explicitly stated for all reported shares, providing clarity on control of the position
- Filed on Schedule 13G as an investment adviser, accompanied by certifications that the position is passive and held in the ordinary course of business
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: A Hong Kong investment adviser reports a passive >5% stake in ZKH, reflecting a meaningful minority holding without control intent.
RAYS Capital Partners Ltd discloses ownership of 251,718,110 Class A shares, equal to 5.5% of the class, with full sole voting and dispositive power over those shares. The filing is submitted on Schedule 13G, and the certifications assert the position is held in the ordinary course of business and not for control purposes. For investors, a >5% passive stake can attract attention but does not itself imply activism or operational influence.
TL;DR: The disclosure indicates a substantial passive stake without an intent to influence control, limiting immediate governance implications.
By using Schedule 13G and providing the required certifications, the filer signals a non-control, passive intent despite sole voting power reported. The ownership level meets regulatory thresholds for disclosure and will be visible to other shareholders and the company, but the filing does not identify proposals, board nominations, or coordination with other holders. Governance impact should be monitored only if later filings signal active engagement.