Alpha Modus (NASDAQ: AMOD) files $250M shelf and $3.5M ATM

Filing Impact

(Neutral)

Filing Sentiment

(Neutral)

Form Type

S-3

Rhea-AI Filing Summary

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. has filed a shelf registration to offer and sell up to $250,000,000 of Class A common stock, warrants and/or units, including up to $3,500,000 of common stock that may be sold through an at-the-market agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co. The company’s common stock and public warrants trade on Nasdaq under “AMOD” and “AMODW.”

Alpha Modus recently completed a business combination with Insight Acquisition Corp. and now operates an AI-powered retail intelligence platform focused on in‑store sensing, analytics and engagement, supported by an extensive patent portfolio. The company is an emerging growth and smaller reporting company and qualifies as a controlled company because its CEO holds majority voting power.

The filing highlights substantial risks, including a going concern qualification, past operating losses and negative operating cash flows, thin trading in the stock, potential dilution from future equity issuances, complex and evolving patent and litigation exposure, increased costs and control challenges as a relatively new Nasdaq-listed public company, and an expectation that no common stock dividends will be paid for the foreseeable future.

Insights

Large mixed shelf and ATM provide funding flexibility but come with meaningful risk disclosures.

Alpha Modus has registered up to $250,000,000 of common stock, warrants and units, with a separate at-the-market component for up to $3,500,000 of common stock under a sales agreement dated January 7, 2026. The ATM shares are part of the same $250,000,000 base shelf capacity, not incremental to it. This structure permits the company to issue securities in multiple formats over time, subject to market conditions and applicable Nasdaq public float limits.

The business profile combines AI retail-intelligence technology with an IP‑centric monetization strategy, but the text emphasizes historical operating losses, negative operating cash flows in 2023 and 2024, and an auditor going concern qualification. The company also notes that its stock is often very thinly traded, so sales under this prospectus could exert pressure on the trading price.

Governance and capital structure details may influence how new securities are received. The CEO holds more than half the voting power, making Alpha Modus a Nasdaq “controlled company,” and the board can issue additional common or preferred shares that could dilute existing holders. The company flags that a large volume of stock potentially sold under this prospectus, ongoing patent litigation costs, higher public-company compliance expenses, and the absence of expected common dividends could all affect future returns, while actual capital-raising activity will depend on specific future offerings under this shelf.

01/07/2026 - 05:30 PM

As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2026

Registration No. __________

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM S-3

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada		20-2675800
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

20311 Chartwell Center Dr., #1469

Cornelius, NC 28031

(704) 252-5050

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,

Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

William Alessi

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

20311 Chartwell Center Dr., #1469

Cornelius, NC 28031

(704) 252-5050

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,

Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

With copies to:

Lance Brunson, Esq.

Chase Chandler, Esq.

Brunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC

Walker Center, 14^th Floor

175 S. Main Street, Suite 1410

Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Telephone: (801) 303-5737

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box. ☐

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box ☒

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐

If this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General Instruction I.D. or a post-effective amendment thereto that shall become effective upon filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act, check the following box: ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment to a registration statement filed pursuant to General Instruction I.D. filed to register additional securities or additional classes of securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box: ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☒	Smaller reporting company ☒
	Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This registration statement contains:

●	a base prospectus which covers the offering, issuance and sale by the registrant of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $250,000,000 of the registrant’s common stock, warrants, and/or units consisting of two or more of these securities; and

●	a sales agreement prospectus supplement covering the offering, issuance and sale of up to $3,500,000 of shares of the registrant’s common stock that may be issued and sold under the At The Market Offering Agreement, dated January 7, 2026 (the “Sales Agreement”), by and between the registrant and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC.

The base prospectus immediately follows this explanatory note. The specific terms of any securities to be offered pursuant to the base prospectus will be specified in a prospectus supplement to the base prospectus. The sales agreement prospectus supplement immediately follows the base prospectus. The common stock that may be offered, issued and sold by the registrant under the sales agreement prospectus supplement is included in the $250,000,000 of securities that may be offered, issued and sold by the registrant under the base prospectus. Upon termination of the Sales Agreement, any portion of the $3,500,000 included in the sales agreement prospectus supplement that is not sold pursuant to the Sales Agreement will be available for sale in other offerings pursuant to the base prospectus.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities or accept an offer to buy these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where such offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 7, 2026

PROSPECTUS

$250,000,000

Common Stock

Warrants

Units

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

This prospectus relates to the offer and sale by Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “Alpha Modus,” “we,” “us” or “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.”), of up to $250,000,000 in the aggregate of the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “common stock”), warrants, or units.

From time to time, we may offer up to $250,000,000 of any combination of the securities described in this prospectus in one or more offerings (the “AMOD Offering”). We may also offer securities as may be issuable upon conversion, redemption, repurchase, exchange or exercise of any securities registered hereunder, including any applicable antidilution provisions.

This prospectus provides a general description of the securities we may offer. Each time we offer securities, we will provide specific terms of the securities offered in a supplement to this prospectus. We may also authorize one or more free writing prospectuses to be provided to you in connection with these offerings. The prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. You should carefully read this prospectus, the applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, as well as any documents incorporated by reference, before you invest in any of the securities being offered.

This prospectus may not be used to consummate a sale of any securities by us unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.

Our common stock and public warrants are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “AMOD” and “AMODW,” respectively. On January 2, 2026, the last reported sales price of our common stock and public warrants was $0.462 and $0.0535, respectively. The applicable prospectus supplement will contain information, where applicable, as to any other listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market or any securities market or other exchange of the securities, if any, covered by the applicable prospectus supplement.

Pursuant to General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3, in no event will we sell our securities in a public primary offering (including the AMOD Offering) with a value exceeding more than one-third of our public float in any 12-month period so long as our public float remains below $75.0 million. As of January 2, 2026, the aggregate market value of our outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates, or public float, was approximately $10,880,847, based on 10,169,016 shares of our outstanding common stock that were held by non-affiliates on such date and a price of $1.07 per share, which was the price at which our common stock was last sold on the Nasdaq Capital Market on November 10, 2025 (a date within 60 days of the date hereof), calculated in accordance with General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3. During the 12 calendar months prior to and including the date of this prospectus, we have not offered and sold any of our securities pursuant to General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3.

We will sell these securities directly to investors, through agents designated from time to time or to or through underwriters or dealers, on a continuous or delayed basis. For additional information on the methods of sale, you should refer to the section entitled “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus. If any agents or underwriters are involved in the sale of any securities with respect to which this prospectus is being delivered, the names of such agents or underwriters and any applicable fees, commissions, discounts or options to purchase additional securities will be set forth in a prospectus supplement. The price to the public of such securities and the net proceeds we expect to receive from such sale will also be set forth in a prospectus supplement.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should review carefully the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” on page 9 of this prospectus as well as those contained in the applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, and under similar headings in the other documents that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The date of this prospectus is [ ], 2026.

Table of Contents

	Page
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS	1
INTRODUCTORY NOTE AND FREQUENTLY USED TERMS	2
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY	4
RISK FACTORS	9
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	27
ABOUT THE COMPANY	28
USE OF PROCEEDS	43
DESCRIPTION OF COMMON STOCK AND RELATED MATTERS	44
DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS	52
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS	54
LEGAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES	54
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION	57
LEGAL MATTERS	59
EXPERTS	59
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	59
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE	60

About This Prospectus

This prospectus is a part of a registration statement on Form S-3 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), utilizing a “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf registration process, we may sell any combination of the securities described in this prospectus in one or more offerings up to a total aggregate offering price of $250,000,000. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the securities we may offer.

Each time we sell securities under this prospectus, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. We may also authorize one or more free writing prospectuses to be provided to you that may contain material information relating to these offerings. The prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be provided to you may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus or in any documents that we have incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You should read this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, together with the information incorporated herein by reference as described under the heading “Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference,” before investing in any of the securities offered.

THIS PROSPECTUS MAY NOT BE USED TO CONSUMMATE A SALE OF SECURITIES UNLESS IT IS
ACCOMPANIED BY A PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.

Neither we, nor any agent, underwriter or dealer has authorized any person to give any information or to make any representation other than those contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. This prospectus, any applicable supplement to this prospectus or any related free writing prospectus do not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the registered securities to which they relate, nor do this prospectus, any applicable supplement to this prospectus or any related free writing prospectus constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.

You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus is accurate on any date subsequent to the date set forth on the front of the document or that any information we have incorporated by reference is correct on any date subsequent to the date of the document incorporated by reference, even though this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus is delivered, or securities are sold, on a later date.

This prospectus contains summaries of certain provisions contained in some of the documents described herein, but reference is made to the actual documents for complete information. All of the summaries are qualified in their entirety by the actual documents. Copies of some of the documents referred to herein have been filed, will be filed or will be incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and you may obtain copies of those documents as described below under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information.”

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTORY NOTE AND FREQUENTLY USED TERMS

On December 13, 2024 (the “Closing” and such date the “Closing Date”), the Company, which was then named Insight Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“IAC”), Alpha Modus, Corp., a Florida corporation (“Legacy Alpha Modus”), and IAC Merger Sub Inc., a Florida corporation and newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of IAC (“Merger Sub”), consummated the Business Combination pursuant to the terms of the Business Combination Agreement.

On the Closing Date, (i) IAC changed its name to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.” (“Alpha Modus” or the “Company”), (ii) Merger Sub merged with and into Legacy Alpha Modus (the “Merger”), with Legacy Alpha Modus surviving the Merger as the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, (iii) the Company issued 5,295,000 shares of common stock and 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock to Legacy Alpha Modus’s shareholders as Merger consideration in the Business Combination, (iv) the Company issued 1,817,308 shares of common stock to various parties as required by the Business Combination Agreement, and (v) the parties to the Business Combination Agreement consummated the other transactions contemplated thereby.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this prospectus to “Alpha Modus,” the “Company,” “us,” “we,” “our” and any related terms prior to the closing of the Business Combination are intended to mean Insight Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, and after the closing of the Business Combination, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

“Amended and Restated Charter” means the second amended and restated certificate of incorporation of Alpha Modus, in effect as of the date of this prospectus.

“Business Combination” means the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement.

“Business Combination Agreement” means the Business Combination Agreement, dated October 13, 2023, as amended by the First Amendment to the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2024, by and among IAC, Merger Sub and Legacy Alpha Modus.

“Alpha Modus” means Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

“Alpha Modus Board” means the board of directors of Alpha Modus.

“Closing” means the closing of the Business Combination.

“common stock” means the common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

“DGCL” means the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended.

“Earnout Shares” means the up to 2,200,000 shares of common stock that may be issued to Legacy Alpha Modus securityholders if certain share prices of common stock are achieved and other conditions are satisfied.

“Founder Shares” means IAC common stock initially purchased and provided.

“IAC” means Insight Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, which was renamed “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.” in connection with the Closing.

“IAC Board” means the board of directors of IAC prior to the Business Combination.

“IAC Charter” means IAC’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 13, 2024.

Table of Contents

“IAC Class A common stock” means the Class A common stock, par value $0.0001, of IAC.

“IAC Class B common stock” means the Class B common stock, par value $0.0001, of IAC.

“IAC IPO” means IAC’s initial public offering that was consummated by IAC on September 8, 2021.

“Legacy Alpha Modus” means Alpha Modus, Corp., a Florida corporation, and includes the surviving corporation after the Merger. References herein to Alpha Modus will include its subsidiaries, including Legacy Alpha Modus, to the extent reasonably applicable

“Legacy Alpha Modus Board” means the board of directors of Legacy Alpha Modus.

“Legacy Alpha Modus Series C Preferred Stock” means shares of Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Alpha Modus of Legacy Alpha Modus.

“Merger” means the merger of Merger Sub with and into Legacy Alpha Modus, with Legacy Alpha Modus continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alpha Modus, in accordance with the terms of the Business Combination Agreement.

“Merger Sub” means IAC Merger Sub Inc., a Florida corporation.

“Private Placement” means the private placement consummated simultaneously with the IAC IPO in which IAC issued to the Sponsor the Private Placement Warrants.

“Private Placement Warrants” means approximately 8,700,000 warrants to purchase shares of IAC Class A common stock issued to the Sponsor and the IAC IPO underwriters in the Private Placement (including the additional warrants purchased after the IAC IPO in connection with the overallotment securities issued by IAC’s underwriters). Each Private Placement Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of IAC Class A common stock for $11.50 per share.

“Public Shares” means IAC Class A common stock underlying the Units sold in the IAC IPO, including any overallotment securities acquired by IAC’s underwriters.

“Public Warrants” means warrants underlying the Units issued in the IAC IPO. Each Public Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of IAC Class A common stock for $11.50 per share.

“Sponsor” means Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which is an affiliate of Michael Singer, IAC’s Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer prior to the Closing.

“Trust Account” means the trust account of IAC, which holds the net proceeds of the IAC IPO, including from overallotment securities sold by IAC’s underwriters, and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, together with interest earned thereon, less amounts released to pay franchise and income tax obligations and up to $100,000 for dissolution expenses, and amounts paid pursuant to redemptions.

“Units” means Units issued in the IAC IPO, including any overallotment securities acquired by IAC’s underwriters, consisting of one share of IAC Class A common stock and one-half of one Public Warrant.

“Warrants” means any of the Private Placement Warrants and the Public Warrants.

Table of Contents

Prospectus Summary

This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you need to consider in making your investment decision. You should carefully read the entire prospectus, the applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, including the risks of investing in our securities discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” contained in the applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, and under similar headings in the other documents that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You should also carefully read the information incorporated by reference into this prospectus, including our financial statements, and the exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this prospectus to the “Company,” “Alpha Modus,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. on a consolidated basis with its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Company Overview

The Company was a blank check company known as “Insight Acquisition Corp.” On December 13, 2024, the Company completed a business combination with Alpha Modus, Corp., a Florida corporation. At closing of the business combination, the Company’s name was changed to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.,” and the Company’s operations are now those of Alpha Modus, Corp.

Alpha Modus builds AI-powered retail intelligence technologies that connect sensing, decisioning, and engagement in physical stores. The Company’s patent portfolio spans computer vision, behavioral analytics, contextual advertising, pricing and promotions, and closed-loop measurement. Alpha Modus partners with retailers and integrators to deliver secure, scalable systems that make stores smarter, faster, and more profitable.

The Alpha Modus technology ecosystem aims to be the engine behind the most transformative retail and digital commerce experiences globally. Alpha Modus is focused on (i) empowering innovation through a scalable, IP-driven platform to deliver transformative retail and digital commerce experiences, (ii) combining technology, services and strategic partnerships to provide a comprehensive ecosystem to drive growth, and (iii) enabling IP-powered innovation across retail, digital engagement, and connected commerce, leveraging its diverse patent portfolio to unlock new opportunities.

Although Alpha Modus’ audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, were prepared under the assumption that it would continue operations as a going concern, the report of its independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, contains a going concern qualification in which such firm expressed substantial doubt about Alpha Modus’ ability to continue as a going concern, based on its financial statements and results at that time, including its lack of current revenues, recurring losses from operations and net capital deficiency.

For more information about Alpha Modus, see the section entitled “About the Company.”

Table of Contents

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) ending December 31, 2026, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior fiscal year’s second fiscal quarter; and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. References herein to “emerging growth company” shall have the meaning associated with it in the JOBS Act.

Smaller Reporting Company

Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (i) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the prior June 30, or (ii) our annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30.

Controlled Company

By virtue of the fact that Alpha Modus’ CEO, William Alessi, is deemed to beneficially own shares of stock having more than 50% of the total voting power of the shares of our capital stock, we qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that (i) a majority of our board consist of independent directors, (ii) we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors, and (iii) we have a nominating/corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.

Summary of Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider all of the information in this prospectus before making an investment in our securities, especially the risks and uncertainties discussed under “Risk Factors.” Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:

	●	The number of shares of common stock that may be sold into the public markets pursuant to this prospectus could have a significant negative impact on the trading price of our common stock.

	●	Alpha Modus had net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities in the past, and it may not achieve or sustain profitability.

	●	If Alpha Modus is unable to continue as a going concern, its securities will have little or no value.

Table of Contents

	●	The artificial intelligence (AI) technology market in which Alpha Modus participates is competitive.

	●	If Alpha Modus fails to adapt to changes in the AI industry, its business may be harmed.

	●	Alpha Modus may fail to protect its intellectual property rights and proprietary information.

	●	Alpha Modus will likely become subject to intellectual property disputes.

	●	Alpha Modus’ patent portfolio is subject to evolving legislation, regulations, and rules associated with patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions, which may adversely affect its business.

	●	Patent litigation is inherently risky, and the USPTO, or other relevant patent offices, may either invalidate Alpha Modus’ patents or materially narrow the scope of their claims.

	●	Alpha Modus may experience delays in successful enforcement and licensing of its patent portfolio.

	●	Because Alpha Modus’ patents are expected to expire in 2034-2037, its continued operations beyond those dates will depend on its ability to obtain additional patents with later expiration dates.

	●	Alpha Modus’ lack of patent enforcement and licensing experience could adversely affect its operations.

	●	Alpha Modus will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company.

	●	Alpha Modus’ management team has limited experience managing a Nasdaq-listed public company.

	●	Alpha Modus is a “controlled company” under Nasdaq’s listing rules and can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

	●	Alpha Modus may issue additional shares of common or preferred stock, which would dilute the interests of stockholders and likely present other risks.

	●	We previously believed that we may have been subject to the excise tax included in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 in connection with redemptions of our common stock after December 31, 2022. Based on final regulations released by the Treasury and IRS, we no longer believe that we are subject to the Excise Tax, but if that conclusion is not correct, we could be subject to the Excise Tax.

	●	We do not expect that we will pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

	●	If Alpha Modus fails to develop or maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, it may not be able to accurately report its financial results or prevent financial fraud.

	●	Alpha Modus’ outstanding Series C Preferred Stock and outstanding debt securities, and the future issuances of other debt securities and equity securities, may adversely affect the Company, including the market price of the Company’s common stock, and be dilutive to existing stockholders.

	●	There can be no assurance that Alpha Modus will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq in the future.

	●	The market price of Alpha Modus’s common stock may decline.

	●	Alpha Modus’s failure to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of its securities.

	●	Alpha Modus is as an “emerging growth company” as well as a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if the Company takes advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make the Company’s securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare the Company’s performance with other public companies.

Table of Contents

The Securities We May Offer

We may offer shares of our common stock, various series of warrants to purchase any of such securities and units consisting of two or more of these securities, up to a total aggregate offering price of $250,000,000 from time to time in one or more offerings by us under this prospectus, together with any applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions at the time of the relevant offering. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the securities we may offer. Each time we offer a type or series of securities under this prospectus, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will describe the specific amounts, prices and other important terms of the securities, including, to the extent applicable:

	●	designation or classification;
	●	aggregate principal amount or aggregate offering price;
	●	maturity, if applicable;
	●	original issue discount, if any;
	●	rates and times of payment of interest or dividends, if any;
	●	redemption, conversion, exchange or sinking fund terms, if any;
	●	conversion or exchange prices or rates, if any, and, if applicable, any provisions for changes to or adjustments in the conversion or exchange prices or rates and in the securities or other property receivable upon conversion or exchange;
	●	ranking, if applicable;
	●	restrictive covenants, if any;
	●	voting or other rights, if any; and
	●	important U.S. federal income tax considerations.

The prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be provided to you may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus or in documents we have incorporated by reference. However, no prospectus supplement or free writing prospectus will offer a security that is not registered and described in this prospectus at the time of the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

This prospectus may not be used to consummate a sale of securities by us unless it is accompanied by a prospectus supplement.

We may sell the securities directly to investors or through underwriters, dealers or agents. We, and our underwriters or agents, reserve the right to accept or reject all or part of any proposed purchase of securities. If we do offer securities through underwriters or agents, we will include in the applicable prospectus supplement:

	●	the names of those underwriters or agents;
	●	applicable fees, discounts and commissions to be paid to them;
	●	details regarding options to purchase additional securities, if any; and
	●	the estimated net proceeds to us.

Common Stock. We may issue shares of our common stock from time to time. Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share for the election of directors and on all other matters that require stockholder approval. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in the assets remaining after payment of liabilities. Our common stock does not carry any preemptive rights enabling a holder to subscribe for, or receive shares of, our common stock or any other securities convertible into shares of common stock, or any redemption rights.

Table of Contents

Warrants. We may issue warrants for the purchase of common stock. We may issue warrants independently or together with common stock, and the warrants may be attached to or separate from these securities. In this prospectus, we have summarized certain general features of the warrants. We urge you, however, to read the applicable prospectus supplement (and any free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be provided to you) related to the particular series of warrants being offered, as well as the complete warrant agreements and warrant certificates that contain the terms of the warrants. Forms of the warrant agreements and forms of warrant certificates containing the terms of the warrants being offered have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and supplemental warrant agreements and forms of warrant certificates will be filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part or will be incorporated by reference from reports that we file with the SEC.

We will evidence each series of warrants by warrant certificates that we will issue. Warrants may be issued under an applicable warrant agreement that we enter into with a warrant agent. We will indicate the name and address of the warrant agent, if applicable, in the prospectus supplement relating to the particular series of warrants being offered.

Units. We may offer units consisting of two or more of the securities described above, in any combination, including common stock and/or warrants in one or more series. The terms of these units will be set forth in a prospectus supplement. The description of the terms of these units in the related prospectus supplement will not be complete. You should refer to the applicable form of unit and unit agreement for complete information with respect to these units.

Dividend Policy

As of the date of this prospectus, we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate declaring or paying, in the foreseeable future, any cash dividends on our capital stock. We intend to retain all available funds and future earnings, if any, to fund the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination regarding the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. We are obligated to pay dividends to certain holders of our preferred stock which we pay out of legally available funds from time to time or reach arrangements with our holders of preferred stock to convert limited quantities of preferred stock at favorable conversion prices in lieu of dividend payments.

Table of Contents

Risk Factors

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Prior to making a decision about investing in our securities, you should consider carefully the specific risk factors discussed in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” contained in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as may be revised or supplemented by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K, as filed with the SEC and which are incorporated in this prospectus by reference in their entirety, as well as any amendment or updates to our risk factors reflected in subsequent filings with the SEC, including any prospectus supplement hereto. These risks and uncertainties are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently view as immaterial, may also impair our business. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be unduly relied upon to anticipate results or trends in future periods. If any of the risks or uncertainties described in our SEC filings or any additional risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. Please also read carefully the section below titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

The number of shares of common stock that may be sold into the public markets pursuant to this prospectus could have a significant negative impact on the trading price of our common stock.

The trading volume of our common stock has historically varied widely, and our common stock is regulary very thinly traded. Accordingly, the number of shares of common stock that may be sold into the public markets pursuant to this prospectus could have a significant negative impact on the trading prices of our common stock and may cause the trading prices of our securities to experience declines in the future.

Risks Related to Alpha Modus’ Business and Industry

Alpha Modus had net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities in the past, and it may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Although Alpha Modus had net income in 2024, it had an operating loss of $834,895 and net cash used in operating activities of $1,676,499 in 2024, and a net loss of $501,295 and net cash used in operating activities of $515,181 in 2023. Alpha Modus cannot assure you that it will be able to generate net profit or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future. Its future revenue growth and profitability will depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control. These factors include effectiveness of its monetization strategy, its ability to control costs and expenses and to manage its growth effectively, market competition, and the macroeconomic and regulatory environment. Alpha Modus may fail to develop and improve its operational, financial and managerial controls, enhance its financial reporting systems and procedures, recruit, train and retain skilled professional personnel, or maintain customer satisfaction to effectively support and manage its future growth. If Alpha Modus invests substantial time and resources to expand its patent family but fails to manage the growth of its business and capitalize on its growth opportunities effectively, it may not be able to achieve profitability, and its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects would be materially and adversely affected.

If Alpha Modus is unable to continue as a going concern, its securities will have little or no value.

Although Alpha Modus’ audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, were prepared under the assumption that it would continue our operations as a going concern, the reports of its independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, contain a going concern qualification in which such firms expressed substantial doubt about Alpha Modus’ ability to continue as a going concern, based on its financial statements and results at that time, including its lack of current revenues, recurring losses from operations and net capital deficiency.

Alpha Modus expects to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses in 2025. Alpha Modus’ prior losses and expected future losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on its financial condition. In addition, continued operations and Alpha Modus’ ability to continue as a going concern may be dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing in the near future and thereafter, and there are no assurances that such financing will be available to it at all or will be available in sufficient amounts or on reasonable terms. Alpha Modus’ financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. If Alpha Modus is unable to generate sufficient additional funds in the future through operations, financings or from other sources or transactions, it will exhaust its resources and will be unable to continue operations. If it cannot continue as a going concern, its shareholders would likely lose most or all of their investment in it.

Table of Contents

The artificial intelligence (AI) technology market in which Alpha Modus participates is competitive, and if it does not compete effectively, its business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

The AI market is competitive and rapidly evolving. The principal competitive factors in Alpha Modus’ market include research and development capabilities, industry know-how, continuous capital investment, product portfolio, among others. Many of Alpha Modus’ competitors have substantial competitive advantages, including larger scale, longer operating history, greater brand recognition, more established relationships with customers, suppliers and partners, and greater financial, research and development, marketing and other resources. As a result, Alpha Modus’ competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than Alpha Modus can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements. In addition, some competitors may offer products, solutions and services that address one or more number of functions with greater depth, application, or functionality greater than Alpha Modus’ solutions and technologies. Alpha Modus’ existing and potential competitors may develop and market new products, solutions and services with functionality comparable to it. If Alpha Modus is unable to compete successfully against its current or potential competitors, its business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted.

If Alpha Modus fails to adapt and respond effectively to rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changing regulations, and changing customer needs, requirements or preferences, its business may be materially and adversely affected.

The AI industry market is subject to rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, regulations and customer needs, requirements and preferences. The success of Alpha Modus’ business will depend, in part, on its ability to adapt and respond to these changes on an effective and timely basis. If it fails to improve its technologies in a way that satisfies potential users or customers of intellectual property that keep pace with rapid technological and industry changes, its business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. If new technologies emerge that are able to deliver competitive products, solutions and services at lower prices, more efficiently, more conveniently or more securely, such technologies could adversely impact Alpha Modus’ ability to compete effectively.

Issues arising in connection with the use of AI in the market generally may result in reputational harm or liability to Alpha Modus.

As with many disruptive innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore Alpha Modus’ business. AI algorithms may be flawed. Datasets may be insufficient or contain biased information. Inappropriate or controversial data practices could impair the acceptance of AI solutions. These deficiencies could undermine the decisions, predictions, or analysis AI applications produce, subjecting the providers of AI technologies generally, including Alpha Modus, to competitive harm, legal liability, and brand or reputational harm. Some AI scenarios present ethical or data privacy issues. If Alpha Modus enables or offers AI solutions that are controversial because of their impact on human rights, privacy, employment, or other social issues, it may experience brand or reputational harm.

Risks Related to Alpha Modus’ Intellectual Property

Alpha Modus may fail to obtain, maintain, and protect its intellectual property rights and proprietary information or prevent third parties from any unauthorized use of its technologies.

Alpha Modus’ trade secrets, trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property rights are critical to its success. Alpha Modus expects to rely on confidentiality agreements and non-compete agreements with third parties to protect its intellectual properties. However, events beyond its control may pose threats to its intellectual property rights and the integrity of its technologies and brand. Effective protection of Alpha Modus’ intellectual property rights is expensive and challenging. While Alpha Modus has taken measures to protect its intellectual property rights by filing patent applications, pursuing patent prosecution, and obtaining patents in the United States, such efforts are inadequate to guard against and prohibit potential infringement and misappropriation. In addition, Alpha Modus’ intellectual property rights may be declared invalid or unenforceable by the courts. Furthermore, Alpha Modus cannot assure you that any of its pending patent or other intellectual property rights applications will ultimately proceed to registration or will result in registration with adequate scope for its business. Some of Alpha Modus’ applications or registrations may be successfully challenged or invalidated by others. If Alpha Modus’ intellectual property rights applications are not successful, it may have to use different intellectual property rights for its affected technologies, or seek to enter into arrangements with any third parties who may have prior registrations, applications or rights, which might not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If Alpha Modus fails to protect or enforce its intellectual property rights, its competitors may use its technologies without authorization. As a result, future customers and partners could then devalue Alpha Modus’ technologies, and Alpha Modus’ ability to compete effectively may be impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Alpha Modus will likely become subject to intellectual property disputes, which are typically costly and may subject us to significant liability and increased costs of business.

Alpha Modus competes in markets where there are a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual and proprietary rights, as well as disputes regarding infringement of these rights. Alpha Modus intends to enforce its patent rights by bringing legal claims against other parties, and its competitors and other third parties may, whether rightly or falsely, bring legal claims against it for infringing on their intellectual property rights. The intellectual property laws in the United States, which cover the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights, are evolving, and litigation is a popular means to resolve commercial disputes. Any intellectual property lawsuits against Alpha Modus, whether successful or not, may harm our brand and reputation.

Prosecuting and defending intellectual property claims is costly and can impose a significant burden on our management and resources. Any intellectual property litigation to which Alpha Modus becomes a party may require it to do one or more of the following:

	●	cease selling, licensing, or using products or features that incorporate the intellectual property rights that Alpha Modus allegedly infringes, misappropriates, or violates;

	●	make substantial payments for legal fees, settlement payments, or other costs or damages, including indemnification of third parties;

	●	obtain a license or enter into a royalty agreement, either of which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, in order to obtain the right to sell or use the relevant intellectual property; or

	●	redesign the allegedly infringing products or services to avoid infringement, misappropriation, or violation, which could be costly, time-consuming, or impossible.

Further, there is no guarantee that Alpha Modus can obtain favorable judgment in its legal cases, in which case it may need to pay damages or be forced to cease using certain intellectual property that is critical to our technology or service offerings. Any resulting liabilities or expenses or required changes to technologies may have a material adverse effect on Alpha Modus’ business, results of operations, and prospects.

Alpha Modus’ intellectual property business is reliant on the strength of is patent portfolios and is subject to evolving legislation, regulations, and rules associated with patent law, which may adversely affect its business.

The success of Alpha Modus’ intellectual property business is heavily dependent on obtaining and enforcing patents. Patent acquisition and enforcement is costly, time-consuming, and inherently uncertain. Obtaining and enforcing patents across various industries, including the artificial intelligence industry, involves a high degree of technological and legal complexity. Alpha Modus’ patent rights may be affected by developments or uncertainty in U.S. or foreign patent statutes, patent case law, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) rules and regulations and the rules and regulations of foreign patent offices. In addition, the United States may, at any time, enact changes to U.S. patent law and regulations, including by legislation, by regulatory rulemaking, or by judicial precedent, that adversely affect the scope of patent protection available and weaken the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement and obtain injunctions and/or damages. For example, over the past several years, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court issued various opinions, and the USPTO modified its guidance for practitioners on multiple occasions, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Other countries may likewise enact changes to their patent laws in ways that adversely diminish the scope of patent protection and weaken the rights of patent owners to obtain patents, enforce against patent infringement, and obtain injunctions and/or damages. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to Alpha Modus’ ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Alpha Modus cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in its patents or in third-party patents, and whether Congress or other foreign legislative bodies may pass patent reform legislation that is unfavorable to it, which may, in turn, affect the value of its patent assets.

Table of Contents

Further, the United States and other governments may, at any time, enact changes to law and regulation that create new avenues for challenging the validity of issued patents. For example, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (described in more detail in the following risk factor) created new administrative post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter-partes review, and derivation proceedings that allow third parties to challenge the validity of issued patents. This applies to all of Alpha Modus’ patents. Because of a lower evidentiary standard in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S. federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a district court action. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to Alpha Modus’ ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken Alpha Modus’ ability to obtain new patents or to enforce its existing patents and patents that it might obtain in the future.

Additionally, new rules regarding the burden of proof in patent enforcement actions could significantly increase the cost of Alpha Modus’ enforcement actions, and new standards or limitations on liability for patent infringement could negatively impact Alpha Modus’ revenue derived from such enforcement actions. In addition, recent federal court decisions have lowered the threshold for obtaining attorneys’ fees in patent infringement cases and increased the level of deference given to a district court’s fee-shifting determination. These decisions may make it easier for district courts to shift a prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees to a non-prevailing party if the district court believes that the case was weak or conducted in an abusive manner. As a result, defendants in patent infringement actions brought by non-practicing entities may elect not to settle because these decisions make it much easier for defendants to get attorneys’ fees.

Finally, it is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at the trial level and outcomes can be unfavorable. It can be difficult to understand complex patented technologies, and as a result, this may lead to a higher rate of unfavorable litigation outcomes. Moreover, in the event of a favorable outcome, there is often a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation. Such appeals are expensive and time consuming, resulting in increased costs and a potential for delayed or foregone revenue opportunities in the event of modification or reversal of favorable outcomes. Although Alpha Modus plans to diligently pursue enforcement litigation, it cannot predict with reliability the decisions that may made by juries and trial courts.

Changes to patent laws in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing Alpha Modus’ ability to protect its product or its current or future product candidates.

Alpha Modus’ success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents is costly, time consuming and inherently uncertain. Patent reform legislation in the United States and other countries, including the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “Leahy-Smith Act”), contributes to those uncertainties and costs. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that have affected the way patent applications are prosecuted and have redefined prior art and provided more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. In addition, the Leahy-Smith Act has transformed the U.S. patent system into a first-to-file system in which, assuming that other requirements of patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent regardless of whether a third party was first to invent the claimed invention. A third party that has filed a patent application in the USPTO after March 2013 but before Alpha Modus could therefore be awarded a patent covering an invention of Alpha Modus even if Alpha Modus had made the invention before it was made by such third party. This requires Alpha Modus or its licensees to be cognizant of the time from invention to filing of a patent application. Furthermore, Alpha Modus’ ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents depends on whether the differences between its technology and the prior art allow its technology to be patentable over the prior art. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing or until issuance, Alpha Modus cannot be certain that it was the first to either (i) file any patent application related to its product or product candidates, or (ii) invent any of the inventions claimed in its patents or patent applications. Even where Alpha Modus has a valid and enforceable patent, Alpha Modus or its licensees may not be able to exclude others from practicing the claimed invention where the other party can show that they used the invention in commerce before our filing date or the other party benefits from a compulsory license.

Table of Contents

Among some of the other changes introduced by the Leahy-Smith Act are changes that (i) affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, (ii) redefine prior art, and (iii) provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. These include changes that limit where a patentee may file a patent infringement suit and provide new opportunities for third parties to challenge issued patents in the USPTO. Alpha Modus or its licensees may be subject to the risk of third-party prior art submissions on pending applications or become a party to opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patents. There is a lower standard of evidence necessary to invalidate a patent claim in a USPTO proceeding relative to the standard in U.S. district or federal court. This could lead third parties to challenge and successfully invalidate Alpha Modus or its licensees’ patents that would not otherwise be invalidated if challenged through the court system. Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate Alpha Modus or its licensees’ patent claims that would not have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. Thus, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of Alpha Modus or its future licensees’ patent applications and the enforcement or defense of Alpha Modus’ issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition, there have been recent proposals for additional changes to the patent laws of the United States and other countries that, if adopted, could impact Alpha Modus or its licensees’ ability to obtain or maintain patent protection for Alpha Modus or its out-licensed proprietary technology or Alpha Modus’ or its licensees’ ability to enforce Alpha Modus or its out-licensed proprietary technology, respectively. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. courts, the USPTO and the relevant law-making bodies in other countries, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken Alpha Modus’ ability to obtain new patents; enforce or shorten the term of Alpha Modus or its licensees’ existing patents and patents that might be obtained in the future; shorten the term that has been lengthened by patent term adjustment of existing patents or patents that Alpha Modus might obtain in the future; or challenge the validity or enforceability of Alpha Modus patents that may be asserted against Alpha Modus by competitors or other third parties. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on Alpha Modus’ business. For example, with respect to patent term adjustment, the Federal Circuit’s recent holding in In re Cellect, LLC, 81 F.4^th 1216 (Fed. Cir. 2023), that obviousness-type double patent analysis for a patent that has received patent term adjustment must be based on the expiration date of the patent after the patent term adjustment has been added, may negatively impact the term of Alpha Modus’ patents.

Finally, Europe’s new Unitary Patent system and Unified Patent Court (the “UPC”) may present uncertainties for Alpha Modus’ ability to protect and enforce patent rights against competitors in Europe. In 2012, the European Patent Package (the “EU Patent Package”), regulations were passed with the goal of providing a single pan-European Unitary Patent system and a new UPC for litigation involving European patents. Implementation of the EU Patent Package occurred in June 2023. Under the UPC, all European patents, including those issued prior to ratification of the European Patent Package, will by default automatically fall under the jurisdiction of the UPC. The UPC will provide Alpha Modus’ competitors with a new forum to centrally revoke European patents and allow for the possibility of a competitor to obtain pan-European injunctions. It will be several years before Alpha Modus will understand the scope of patent rights that will be recognized and the strength of patent remedies that will be provided by the UPC. Under the EU Patent Package, Alpha Modus will have the right to opt patents out of the UPC over the first seven years of the court’s existence, but doing so may preclude Alpha Modus from realizing the benefits of the new unified court.

Patent litigation is inherently risky because courts may find Alpha Modus’ patents invalid, not infringed, or unenforceable, and the USPTO, or other relevant patent office, may either invalidate Alpha Modus’ patents or materially narrow the scope of their claims during the course of a reexamination, opposition or other such proceeding.

Patent litigation is inherently risky and may result in the invalidation of Alpha Modus’ patents, even if it is the plaintiff in an underlying action. It is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at any level. Although Alpha Modus intends to diligently pursue enforcement litigation, it cannot predict with significant reliability the decisions made by juries and trial courts. At the trial level, it is often difficult for juries and trial judges to understand complex, patented technologies, and as a result, there is a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation.

Table of Contents

The defendant to any case Alpha Modus brings may file as many appeals as allowed by right, including to District Court, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Such appeals are expensive and time-consuming, and the outcomes of such appeals are sometimes unpredictable, resulting in increased costs and reduced or delayed revenue which could have a material adverse effect on Alpha Modus’ results of operations and financial condition. These appeals may also result in the invalidation of Alpha Modus’ patents, which may have an adverse impact on Alpha Modus’ operations and financial performance.

The enforcement of Alpha Modus’ intellectual property rights depends in part upon its ability to retain the best legal counsel in order to achieve favorable outcomes from litigation, and Alpha Modus’ desired legal counsel may become conflicted out of such representation.

The success of Alpha Modus’ intellectual property enforcement efforts will depend in part upon its ability to retain the best legal counsel to coordinate its patent infringement litigation matters. As Alpha Modus’ intellectual property business evolves, Alpha Modus expects that it will become more difficult to find the best legal counsel to handle all of its patent enforcement matters due in part to potential conflicts of interest. This is because, from time to time, the counterparties to litigation matters have previously engaged world class law firms that are specialized in connection with the industries of the patents at issue in such matters. These previous engagements may have, or may in the future, result in these firms being conflicted out of representing us.

In addition, counterparties in Alpha Modus’ patent litigation matters may devote a substantial amount of resources to avoid or limit a finding that they are liable for infringing on Alpha Modus’ patents or, in the event liability is found, to avoid or limit the amount of associated damages. There is a risk these counterparties may file inter-partes reviews, reexaminations or other proceedings with the USPTO or other government agencies in the United States or abroad in an attempt to invalidate, narrow the scope or render unenforceable the patents Alpha Modus owns or controls. If this were to occur, it may have a significant negative impact on Alpha Modus’ intellectual property.

The inability to retain the best legal counsel to represent Alpha Modus in infringement actions may result in unfavorable or adverse outcomes, which may result in losses, exhaustion of financial resources or other adverse effects which could encumber Alpha Modus’ ability to effectively operate its business or execute its business strategy. Alpha Modus cannot provide any assurance that any prospective patent prosecution or litigation matters will result in a favorable outcome.

Alpha Modus may experience delays in successful prosecution, enforcement, and licensing of its patent portfolio.

The value of Alpha Modus’ patent portfolios is dependent upon the issuance of patents in a timely manner. More patent applications are filed each year. Alpha Modus believes this increase in patent applications has resulted in longer delays in obtaining approval of pending patent applications. If the USPTO experiences reductions in funding, it could have an adverse impact on the cost of processing pending patent applications and the value of those pending patent applications, negatively impacting the value of Alpha Modus’ patent applications. Further, reductions in funding from Congress could result in higher patent application filing and maintenance fees charged by the USPTO, causing an increase in Alpha Modus’ expenses. Application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue from these patents and could cause Alpha Modus to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.

After prosecuting Alpha Modus’ patents, Alpha Modus’ intellectual property business can incur significant general and administrative and legal expenses prior to entering into license agreements and generating license revenues. Alpha Modus plans to spend considerable resources educating prospective licensees on the benefits of a license arrangement with it. As such, Alpha Modus may incur significant losses in any particular period before any associated revenue stream begins.

Alpha Modus believes that it will frequently be engaged in litigation to enforce its patents, protect its trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Enforcement proceedings are typically protracted and complex. The costs are typically substantial, and the outcomes are unpredictable. Enforcement actions divert managerial, technical, legal and financial resources from business operations, and there are no assurances that such enforcement actions will result in favorable results for Alpha Modus.

Table of Contents

Patent litigation schedules in general, and in particular trial dates, are subject to routine adjustment, and in most cases delay, as courts adjust their calendars or respond to requests from one or more parties. Trial dates often are rescheduled by the court for various reasons that are often unrelated to the underlying patent assets and typically for reasons that are beyond our control. As a result, to the extent such events are an indicator of possible future revenue opportunities for Alpha Modus, or other outcome determinative events, they may and often do change which can result in delay of the expected scheduled event. Any such delay could be significant and could affect the corresponding future revenue opportunities, thus adversely impacting Alpha Modus’ business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, federal courts are becoming more crowded, and as a result, patent enforcement litigation is taking longer. Alpha Modus’ anticipated patent enforcement actions are expected to be almost exclusively prosecuted in federal court. Federal trial courts that hear patent enforcement actions also hear criminal cases. Criminal cases tend to take priority over patent enforcement actions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the length of time it will take to complete an enforcement action. Moreover, Alpha Modus believes there is a trend in increasing numbers of civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings before federal judges, and, as a result, it believes that the risk of delays in patent enforcement actions will have a greater negative effect on Alpha Modus’ business in the future unless this trend changes.

Because Alpha Modus’ patents are expected to expire in 2034-2037, its continued operations beyond those dates will depend on its ability to obtain additional patents with later expiration dates.

Alpha Modus’ current patents are expected to expire in 2034-2037. If Alpha Modus does not obtain patents or other intellectual property with expiration dates that extend beyond those years, its operations would be adversely affected.

Alpha Modus’ lack of patent enforcement and licensing experience could adversely affect its operations.

Alpha Modus has limited patent enforcement experience and cannot provide any assurance that it will be able to effectively manage patent enforcement efforts. Patent enforcement litigation is complex and needs to be closely and carefully managed. Because Alpha Modus does not have experience in managing patent enforcement efforts, it may not do so effectively, and its enforcement efforts could be harmed as a result. Similarly, Alpha Modus has limited experience managing intellectual property licensing programs, and this lack of experience could impair its ability to execute its business plans.

Alpha Modus may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting, and defending patents in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States could be less extensive than those in the United States. Alpha Modus may not choose, or be able, to obtain patent protection outside the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States, even in jurisdictions where Alpha Modus does pursue patent protection. Consequently, Alpha Modus may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing its intellectual property in all countries outside the United States, even in jurisdictions where it does pursue patent protection.

Competitors may use Alpha Modus’ technologies in jurisdictions where it has not pursued and obtained patent protection and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where Alpha Modus has patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with Alpha Modus’ technologies. Alpha Modus’ patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Table of Contents

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets, and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to technology products, which could make it difficult for Alpha Modus to stop infringement of its intellectual property. Proceedings to enforce patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert Alpha Modus’ efforts and attention from other aspects of its business, could put its patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against it. Alpha Modus may not prevail in any lawsuits that it initiates, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, Alpha Modus’ efforts to enforce intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from its intellectual property.

Many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If Alpha Modus is forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any of its patents, its competitive position may be impaired, and its business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Being a Public Company

Alpha Modus will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and its management will devote substantial time to compliance with its public company responsibilities and corporate governance practices.

Alpha Modus will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that it did not incur as a private company, and these expenses may increase even more after Alpha Modus is no longer an emerging growth company, as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act. As a public company, Alpha Modus will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as rules adopted, and to be adopted, by the SEC and Nasdaq, and other applicable securities rules and regulations, which impose various requirements on public companies, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Alpha Modus’ management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these public company requirements. Moreover, Alpha Modus expects these rules and regulations to substantially increase its legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. The increased costs will increase Alpha Modus’ net loss. Alpha Modus may need to hire additional legal, accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge and maintain an internal audit function.

In addition, changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs, and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations and may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Alpha Modus intends to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations, and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If Alpha Modus’s efforts to comply with new laws, regulations, and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against Alpha Modus and its business may be adversely affected.

The rules and regulations applicable to public companies make it more expensive for Alpha Modus to obtain and maintain director and officer liability insurance, and Alpha Modus may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for Alpha Modus to attract and retain qualified members of its board of directors, particularly to serve on Alpha Modus’s audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

Alpha Modus cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs it may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for Alpha Modus to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on its board of directors, its board committees or as executive officers.

Table of Contents

Alpha Modus’ management team has limited experience managing a Nasdaq-listed public company.

Alpha Modus’ management team has limited experience managing a Nasdaq-listed public company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to exchange-listed public companies. Alpha Modus’ management team may not successfully or efficiently manage their new roles and responsibilities. Alpha Modus’ transition to being a public company subjects it to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents will require significant attention from Alpha Modus’ senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of Alpha Modus’ business, which could adversely affect Alpha Modus’ business, financial condition, and operating results.

If we were deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), we may be required to liquidate the Company.

There is currently uncertainty concerning the applicability of the Investment Company Act to a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”), and we, as a former SPAC, may in the future be subject to a claim that we have been operating as an unregistered investment company. If we are deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we may be required to liquidate. If we are required to liquidate, our investors would not be able to realize the benefits of owning stock in a successor operating business, including the potential appreciation in the value of our stock and warrants following such a transaction, and our warrants would expire worthless.

Upon closing our initial IPO in September 2021, the net proceeds of the IPO and of a private offering of warrants were placed in a trust account located in the United States with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee, and invested only in U.S. “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invested only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, until the earlier of: (i) the completion of a Business Combination and (ii) the distribution of the trust account as described below. The longer that the funds in the trust account were held in short-term U.S. government securities or in money market funds invested exclusively in such securities, the greater the risk that we may be considered an unregistered investment company, in which case we would be required to register as an investment company with the SEC.

Alpha Modus is a “controlled company” within the meaning of the listing rules of Nasdaq and, as a result, can rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.

Alpha Modus’ CEO, William Alessi, is deemed to beneficially own or control approximately 74.3% of Alpha Modus’s common stock and 90% of Alpha Modus’s preferred stock. As a result, Alpha Modus is deemed to be a “controlled company” as defined under the listing rules of Nasdaq. Under Nasdaq listing rules, controlled companies are companies of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group, or another company. For as long as Alpha Modus remains a controlled company, Alpha Modus will be permitted to elect to rely on certain exemptions from Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules, including the following:

	●	an exemption from the rule that a majority of its board of directors must be independent directors;

	●	an exemption from the rule that its compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors;

	●	an exemption from the rule that its director nominees must be selected or recommended solely by independent directors or a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors;

Although Alpha Modus does not currently intend for Alpha Modus to rely on the “controlled company” exemptions to Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules, Alpha Modus could elect to rely on these exemptions in the future. If it elected to rely on those “controlled company” exemptions, a majority of the members of Alpha Modus’s board of directors might not be independent directors, its nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees might not consist entirely of independent directors, and you would not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of Nasdaq’s corporate governance rules.

Table of Contents

Alpha Modus may issue shares of common or preferred stock, which would dilute the interests of stockholders and likely present other risks.

Alpha Modus may issue shares of common or preferred stock for financing or other reasons. The issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:

	●	may significantly dilute the equity interest of existing investors;

	●	may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded to holders of common stock;

	●	could cause a change in control if a substantial number of common stock is issued, which may affect, among other things, Alpha Modus’s ability to use its net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of Alpha Modus’s present officers and directors; and

	●	may adversely affect prevailing market prices for Alpha Modus’s common stock and/or warrants.

We previously believed that we may have been subject to the Excise Tax included in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 in connection with redemptions of our Common Stock after December 31, 2022. Based on final regulations released by the Treasury and IRS, we no longer believe that we are subject to the Excise Tax, but if that conclusion is not correct, we could be subject to the Excise Tax.

On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”), which, among other things, imposes a 1% excise tax on any publicly traded domestic corporation that repurchases its stock after December 31, 2022 (the “Excise Tax”). The Excise Tax is imposed on the fair market value of the repurchased stock, with certain exceptions. Because we are a Delaware corporation and because our securities trade on Nasdaq, we are a “covered corporation” within the meaning of the Inflation Reduction Act. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) was given authority to provide regulations and other guidance to carry out and prevent the abuse or avoidance of the Excise Tax.

On November 24, 2025, the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued final regulations under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 4501 (Treasury Decision 10037). Under these final regulations, transition relief from the Excise Tax under Section 4501 is appropriate for certain types of stock issued prior to the date of enactment of the IRA if the covered corporation no longer has discretion as to whether to repurchase such stock after that date. These final regulations specifically incorporate transition relief for mandatorily redeemable stock and for stock subject by its terms to a unilateral put option of the holder, if such stock was outstanding prior to August 16, 2022.

While we previously believed that the Excise Tax may have applied to redemptions of our Class A common stock in connection with our Business Combination completed in 2024, based on the November 24, 2025, final regulations described above, we no longer believe the Excise Tax applies the Company’s prior common stock redemptions, since those redemptions occurred solely with respect to redeemable stock issued by the Company in its original IPO in September 2021, such that those redemptions are not treated as stock repurchases for purposes of IRC Section 4501 because that stock was outstanding prior to August 16, 2022. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2025, the Company’s had an Excise Tax payable and liability of $2,348,302, but future periods will reflect the removal of the Excise Tax liability.

If our conclusions regarding the applicability of the transition relief provided by the November 24, 2025, final regulations described above are incorrect, we could still be subject to liability arising from the Excise Tax.

We do not expect that we will pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We expect that we will retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund our operations and the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect that we will pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

The Company’s board of directors will have complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends. Even if the board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount, and form of such dividends, if any, will depend on the future results of operations and cash flow, capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by the Company from its subsidiaries, the Company’s financial condition, contractual restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors. There is no guarantee that the shares of Company common stock will appreciate in value or that the trading price of the shares will not decline. Holders of the Company common stock should not rely on an investment in shares of common stock as a source for any future dividend income.

Table of Contents

The existence of indemnification rights to the Company’s directors, officers, and employees may result in substantial expenditures by the Combined Company and may discourage lawsuits against its directors, officers, and employees.

The Amended and Restated Charter contains indemnification provisions obligating the Company to provide indemnification for its directors, officers, and employees in certain circumstances. Such indemnification obligations could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against its directors, executive officers, and employees, which it may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also discourage the Company from bringing a lawsuit against its directors and executive officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by its stockholders against its directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit the Company and its stockholders.

If the Company fails to develop or maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, it may not be able to accurately report its financial results or prevent financial fraud. As a result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in its financial reporting.

The Company is subject to the risk that its independent registered public accounting firm could communicate to its board of directors that it has deficiencies in its internal control structure that they consider to be “significant deficiencies.” A “significant deficiency” is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the entity’s internal controls.

Effective internal control is necessary to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, it could be subject to regulatory action or other litigation and its operating results could be harmed.

The Company’s intended business, operations, and accounting are expected to be substantially more complex than they have been to date. It may be time consuming, difficult, and costly for the Company to develop and implement the internal control and reporting procedures required by the Exchange Act. the Company may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal control, and other finance personnel in order to develop and implement appropriate internal control and reporting procedures. If the Company is unable to comply with the internal control over financial reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, then it may not be able to obtain the required independent accountant certifications, which may preclude it from keeping its filings current with the SEC.

Further, a material weakness in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting could result in an increased chance of fraud and the loss of customers, reduce the Company’s ability to obtain financing, and require additional expenditures to comply with these requirements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, and financial condition.

If the Company is unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, including as applicable standards governing internal control are modified, supplemented, or amended from time to time, the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could cause the Company to face regulatory action and cause investors to lose confidence in its reported financial information, either of which could adversely affect the value of the Company common stock.

Risks Related to Ownership of Alpha Modus’s Shares

The Amended and Restated Charter requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in the Company’s name, as applicable, against their respective directors, officers, other employees or stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware, which may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against the Company’s directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, as applicable.

The Amended and Restated Charter requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in Alpha Modus’s name, as applicable, against their respective directors, officers, other employees or stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware or, if the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction, in the federal district court of the State of Delaware. This exclusive forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with Alpha Modus, or any of their respective directors, officers, other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims, although their respective stockholders will not be deemed to have waived their compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. However, there is no assurance that a court would enforce the choice of forum provision contained in the Amended and Restated Charter. If a court were to find such provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, Alpha Modus may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm their business, operating results and financial condition.

Table of Contents

The Amended and Restated Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision will be applicable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. The Amended and Restated Charter also provides that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

The exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, federal courts will have exclusive jurisdiction over suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. As noted above, the Amended and Restated Charter provides that the federal district courts of the United States will be, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act. Due to the concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts created by Section 22 of the Securities Act over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce the exclusive form provision. Investors also cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in the Amended and Restated Charter and the Company’s Bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

The Amended and Restated Charter and the Company’s Bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:

	●	no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;

	●	the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director with or without cause by stockholders, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

	●	the ability of our board of directors to determine whether to issue shares of our preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

	●	a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

	●	the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

	●	limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;

Table of Contents

	●	controlling the procedures for the conduct and scheduling of stockholder meetings;

	●	providing for a staggered board, in which the members of the board of directors are divided into three classes to serve for a period of three years from the date of their respective appointment or election;

	●	granting the ability to remove directors with cause by the affirmative vote of 66 2∕3% in voting power of the outstanding shares of Alpha Modus common stock entitled to vote thereon;

	●	requiring the affirmative vote of at least 66 2∕3% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Alpha Modus entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, to amend the Proposed Bylaws or certain sections of the Amended and Restated Charter; and

	●	advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to Alpha Modus Board or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of Alpha Modus.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay hostile takeovers and changes in control of Alpha Modus or changes in Alpha Modus Board and Alpha Modus’s management.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the DGCL, which prevents some stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all of Alpha Modus common stock. Any provision of Amended and Restated Charter, the Proposed Bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of Alpha Modus common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for Alpha Modus common stock. For more information, see the section of this proxy statement/prospectus captioned “Description of Securities— Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and the IAC Charter and Bylaws.”

Claims for indemnification by Alpha Modus’s directors and officers may reduce Alpha Modus’s available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims against Alpha Modus and may reduce the amount of money available to Alpha Modus.

The Company’s Bylaws provide that Alpha Modus will indemnify its directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL, the Bylaws and indemnification agreements that the Company has entered into with its directors and officers provide that:

	●	Alpha Modus will indemnify its directors and officers for serving Alpha Modus in those capacities or for serving other business enterprises at its request, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that a corporation may indemnify such person if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the registrant and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful;

	●	Alpha Modus may, in its discretion, indemnify employees and agents in those circumstances where indemnification is permitted by applicable law;

	●	Alpha Modus will be required to advance expenses, as incurred, to its directors and officers in connection with defending a proceeding, except that such directors or officers shall undertake to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification;

	●	Alpha Modus will not be obligated pursuant to its Proposed Bylaws to indemnify a person with respect to proceedings initiated by that person against Alpha Modus or its other indemnitees, except with respect to proceedings authorized by its board of directors or brought to enforce a right to indemnification; and

	●	the rights conferred in the Proposed Bylaws are not exclusive, and Alpha Modus is authorized to enter into indemnification agreements with its directors, officers, employees and agents and to obtain insurance to indemnify such persons.

Table of Contents

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about Alpha Modus, its business, or its market, or if they change their recommendations regarding Alpha Modus’s securities adversely, the price and trading volume of Alpha Modus’s securities could decline.

The trading market for Alpha Modus’s securities will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about Alpha Modus, its business, market or competitors. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, to the knowledge of management, and may never, publish research on Alpha Modus. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of Alpha Modus, Alpha Modus’s share price and trading volume would likely be negatively impacted. If any of the analysts who may cover Alpha Modus change their recommendation regarding Alpha Modus common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about Alpha Modus’s competitors, the price of shares of Alpha Modus common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover Alpha Modus were to cease coverage of Alpha Modus or fail to regularly publish reports on it, Alpha Modus could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause its share price or trading volume to decline.

The Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and some of the Company’s debt securities, and the future issuances of other debt securities and equity securities, may adversely affect us, including the market price of the Company’s common stock and be dilutive to existing stockholders.

We issued 7,500,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in the Business Combination. The Series C Preferred Stock will generally be convertible at any time 18 months following the Closing of the Business Combination and may convert in some circumstances into more than 7,500,000 shares of common stock. Conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock into common Stock will be dilutive to existing stockholders and may reduce the market price of common stock. For example, if there has never been a Trigger Event (as defined below), shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which have a deemed face value of $10.00 per share (the “Face Value”) will convert into shares of common stock at the lesser of the Face Value or the average of the 5 lowest closing prices of common stock during the 10 trading days preceding conversion. However, following a following any Trigger Event, such conversion shall be at the lesser of the Face Value or 50.0% of the average of the lowest closing prices during the 10 trading days preceding conversion. “Trigger Event” generally means (i) the Company’s failure to deliver conversion shares when required; (ii) violation of or failure to timely perform any covenant in the designation of the rights of the Series C Preferred Stock; (iii) suspension from trading or delisting from the Company’s principal trading exchange or market; (iv) notification of an intention not to comply with a conversion notice; (v) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation or similar proceedings; (vi) the appointment of a custodian, receiver or similar official for the Company; (vii) judgments in excess of $500,000 which are not stayed or satisfied within 30 days of entry; (viii) failure to comply with reporting requirements of Securities Exchange Act; (ix) any regulatory, administrative or enforcement proceeding is initiated against IAC; or (x) any material provision of the designation of the rights of the Series C Preferred Stock ceases to be valid or is contested. As a result, regardless of whether a Trigger Event occurs, if the trading price of the Company’s common stock is less than $10.00/share at the time of conversion, the Series C Preferred Stock will generally convert into more than 7,500,000 shares, and if the trading price is substantially lower than $10.00/share or a Trigger Event occurs, into substantially more than 7,500,000 shares.

Shares of Series C Preferred Stock will rank senior to the Company’s common stock with respect to rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution. The Series C Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share or an aggregate liquidation preference of $75,000,000 over holders of common stock. This preference, and conversion rights associated with the Series C Preferred Stock, may adversely affect us and reduce returns for holders, or the market price, of the Company’s common stock.

Additionally, we have issued debt instruments that permit the holders to convert their Company debt into Company common stock, and any such shares of common stock issued upon conversion would be dilutive to existing stockholders and when sold into the public markets may adversely the market price of the Company’s common stock.

Table of Contents

In the future, we may also incur debt or issue other equity ranking senior to the Company’s common stock, like the Series C Preferred Stock. Those securities could generally have priority upon liquidation. Such securities also may be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of the Company’s common stock. Because our decision to issue debt or equity in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of our future capital raising efforts. As a result, future capital-raising efforts may reduce the market price of the Company’s common stock and be dilutive to existing stockholders.

There can be no assurance that the Company’s common stock will continue to be so listed, or that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of Nasdaq.

There can be no assurance that the Company’s common stock will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq, or that we will be able to comply with Nasdaq’s continued listing standards. If Nasdaq delists Alpha Modus’s shares from trading on its exchange for failure to meet Nasdaq’s listing standards, Alpha Modus and its stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including, but not limited to:

	●	a limited availability of market quotations for Alpha Modus’s securities;

	●	reduced liquidity for Alpha Modus’s securities;

	●	a determination that Alpha Modus common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in Alpha Modus common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for Alpha Modus common stock;

	●	a limited amount of analyst coverage; and

	●	a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because Alpha Modus common stock and Public Warrants are listed on Nasdaq, they are covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state, other than the State of Idaho, having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if Alpha Modus was no longer listed on Nasdaq, Alpha Modus’s securities would not be covered securities and Alpha Modus would be subject to regulation in each state in which Alpha Modus offers its securities.

An active market for Alpha Modus’s securities may not develop, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of Alpha Modus’s securities.

The price of Alpha Modus’s securities may vary significantly due to factors specific to Alpha Modus as well as to general market or economic conditions. Furthermore, an active trading market for Alpha Modus’s securities may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. Holders of Alpha Modus’s securities may be unable to sell their securities unless a market can be established and sustained.

The market price of the Company’s common stock may decline.

Fluctuations in the price of the Company’s securities could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. Prior to the Business Combination, there was no active public market for the Company’s common stock. If an active market for Alpha Modus’s securities develops and continues, the trading price of Alpha Modus’s securities in the future could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond Alpha Modus’s control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in Alpha Modus’s securities and Alpha Modus’s securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of Alpha Modus’s securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.

Table of Contents

The market price of Alpha Modus common stock may decline for a number of other reasons including if:

	●	investors react negatively to the prospects of Alpha Modus’s business operations, results, and prospects;

	●	actual or anticipated fluctuations in Alpha Modus’s quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to it;

	●	changes in the market’s expectations about Alpha Modus’s operating results;

	●	success of competitors;

	●	changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning Alpha Modus or the AI industry in general;

	●	operating and share price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to Alpha Modus;

	●	Alpha Modus’s ability to market new and enhanced products and technologies on a timely basis;

	●	changes in laws and regulations affecting Alpha Modus’s business;

	●	Alpha Modus’s ability to meet compliance requirements;

	●	commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving Alpha Modus;

	●	changes in Alpha Modus’s capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;

	●	the volume of Alpha Modus’s shares of common stock available for public sale; or

	●	any major change in Alpha Modus’s Board or management.

Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by Alpha Modus or its stockholders in the public market could cause the market price for Alpha Modus common stock to decline.

The sale of shares of Alpha Modus common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of Alpha Modus common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for Alpha Modus to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that it deems appropriate.

All shares currently held by public stockholders and all of the shares issued in the Business Combination to existing Alpha Modus stockholders are freely tradable without registration under the Securities Act, and without restriction by persons other than Alpha Modus’s “affiliates” (as defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, “Rule 144”), including Alpha Modus’s directors, executive officers and other affiliates.

In the future, Alpha Modus may also issue its securities in connection with investments or acquisitions. The amount of shares of Alpha Modus common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of the then-outstanding shares of Alpha Modus common stock. Any issuance of additional securities in connection with investments or acquisitions may result in additional dilution to Alpha Modus stockholders.

Table of Contents

Alpha Modus’s failure to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of its Securities.

On January 6, 2025, Alpha Modus received a written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) indicating that the Company no longer met the minimum market value of publicly held shares (“MVPHS”) of $15,000,000 required by Nasdaq’s listing rules to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Market. On February 5, 2025, Alpha Modus received another written notice from Nasdaq indicating that the Company no longer met the minimum market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) of $50,000,000 required by Nasdaq’s listing rules to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Market. On July 10, 2025, Nasdaq approved the Company’s application to transfer its securities listings from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market, and the Company’s securities listings were transferred to the Nasdaq Capital Market on July 14, 2025. The listing transfer resolved the MVPHS and MVLS deficiencies.

On [ ], 2026, the Company received a written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq indicating that the Company was not in compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). The Nasdaq listing rules require listed securities to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share, and, based upon the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock for the prior 30 consecutive business days, the Company no longer met this requirement. The Nasdaq rules provide the Company a compliance period of 180 calendar days from the date of the notice (or until [ ], 2026) in which to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.

If Alpha Modus is unable to remain in compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market’s listing rules, Nasdaq may take steps to delist the Company’s securities. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of the securities and would impair your ability to sell or purchase the securities when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, Alpha Modus can provide no assurance that any action taken by it to restore compliance with listing requirements would allow its securities to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of its securities, prevent its securities from dropping below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements. Additionally, if Alpha Modus’s securities are not listed on, or become delisted from, Nasdaq for any reason, and are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, an inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities that is not a national securities exchange, the liquidity and price of our securities may be more limited than if we were quoted or listed on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market can be established or sustained.

Alpha Modus qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as well as a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if Alpha Modus takes advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make Alpha Modus’s securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare Alpha Modus’s performance with other public companies.

Alpha Modus qualifies as an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, Alpha Modus may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as Alpha Modus continues to be an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, (i) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in Alpha Modus’s periodic reports and proxy statements and (iii) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, Alpha Modus’s stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. Alpha Modus will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of Alpha Modus common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which Alpha Modus has total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year (as indexed for inflation), (iii) the date on which Alpha Modus has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in the prior three-year period or (iv) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common stock in the IAC IPO. Investors may find Alpha Modus’s securities less attractive because Alpha Modus will rely on these exemptions. Alpha Modus cannot predict whether investors will find its securities less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find Alpha Modus’s securities less attractive as a result of its reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of Alpha Modus’s securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for its securities and the trading prices of its securities may be more volatile.

Table of Contents

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of Alpha Modus’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Additionally, Alpha Modus will qualify as a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. Alpha Modus will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (i) the market value of Alpha Modus common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter, or (ii) its annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of Alpha Modus common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter. To the extent Alpha Modus takes advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of its financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.

Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our initial business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an initial business combination.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a target business with which we seek to complete our initial business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such business combination.

We have identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.

We have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2024, and as of December 31, 2023, because material weaknesses existed in our internal control over financial reporting. We have taken a number of measures to remediate the material weaknesses described therein; however, if we are unable to remediate our material weaknesses in a timely manner or we identify additional material weaknesses, we may be unable to provide required financial information in a timely and reliable manner and we may incorrectly report financial information. Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our Class A common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Failure to timely file will cause us to be ineligible to utilize short form registration statements on Form S-3 or, which may impair our ability to obtain capital in a timely fashion to execute our business strategies or issue shares to effect an acquisition. In either case, the existence of material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our business and our reputation or investor perceptions of us, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock. In addition, we will incur additional costs to remediate material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation of those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We can give no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This prospectus, each prospectus supplement and the information incorporated by reference in this prospectus and each prospectus supplement contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Although our forward-looking statements reflect the good faith judgment of our management, these statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, these forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “will,” “plan,” “intends,” “estimates,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “continue,” “seeks,” “pro forma,” or “anticipates,” or other similar words (including their use in the negative), or by discussions of future matters such as our business, business strategy, products and services we may offer in the future, the outcome and impact of litigation, the timing and results of future regulatory filings, our ability to collect from major customers, our sales and marketing strategy and capital outlook, our estimates regarding our capital requirements, future expenses and need for additional financing, our use of the net proceeds from any offering and other statements that are not historical. These statements include but are not limited to statements under the captions “Business,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in other sections incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as applicable, as well as our other filings with the SEC. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement and any documents incorporated by reference herein or therein could substantially harm our business, operating results and financial condition and that if any of these events occurs, it could adversely affect the value of an investment in our securities.

The cautionary statements made in this prospectus are intended to be applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they may appear in this prospectus or in any prospectus supplement or any documents incorporated by reference herein or therein. We urge you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

Table of Contents

ABOUT THE COMPANY

Alpha Modus engages in creating, developing and licensing data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store digital experience at the point of decision. The company was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Cornelius, North Carolina.

Since its launch, Alpha Modus has defined and kept to its corporate mission by solving pain-points using actionable insights found in previously unstructured data and through the use of artificial intelligence which turns previously unstructured data, into valuable actionable insights. Alpha Modus began serving several clients in the financial markets and real estate industry. It was through these efforts that Alpha Modus gained acceptance for its thought-leading technology in data analytics as an IBM partner by leveraging the use of IBM Blue Mix cloud services platform powered by Watson. In 2016, following rigorous engagement and working alongside partner IBM, Alpha Modus was presented with a Beacon Award for “Best New Application on IBM Cloud” and anointed with the title “IBM’s born on the cloud, start-up of the century.” This award came as a result of Alpha Modus developing an algorithmic trading concept to better predict New York Stock Exchange market activity into the close of trading.

In 2017, Alpha Modus was introduced to Michael Garel, Founder and CEO of eyeQ. eyeQ was also an IBM partner and a recipient of an IBM Beacon award in 2015. eyeQ was an Austin, Texas-based startup with a focus on serving the retail sector with hardware devices which accompanied a SaaS revenue model. With the original intent of Alpha Modus leveraging eyeQ’s technology, which gathered consumer and brand metadata, for the purpose of predicting retail sales data, Alpha Modus acquired eyeQ’s assets and pending patent applications in 2018. After the acquisition, Alpha Modus took over management of the eyeQ patent portfolio, including the pending patent applications. This led to the ‘571 patent issuance in August of 2019. During this time, Alpha Modus attempted to license the ‘571 patent to previous eyeQ customers and prospective customers in the eyeQ sales pipeline. However, the technology covered under the ‘571 patent was not yet embraced by most retailers. Additionally, other previous customers and prospective customers in the eyeQ sales pipeline were beginning to launch their own internal initiatives for data-driven point-of-sale technologies. Faced with difficulty in licensing the single ‘571 patent while trying to re-engaging eyeQ’s previous clientele, Alpha Modus chose to pause immediate sales and licensing efforts and focus solely on continued innovation of the technology covered by the ‘571 patent, which evolved into additional patents and services that are in a better position to compete for licensing and services revenue in the foreseeable future.

As technological innovation is at the core of the company, Alpha Modus has developed comprehensive end-to-end patented solutions for retailers and consumer brands to bring innovation to consumers and enhance their experience at the point of sale. Some examples that the ‘571 patent family could potentially include use in the following:

	●	targeted marketing campaigns;

	●	actionable insights on consumer product packaging;

	●	inventory control;

	●	smart planograms;

	●	in-store heatmapping of consumer traffic;

	●	consumer behavior; and

	●	staffing needs based on foot traffic in a retail location.

The primary focus of Alpha Modus’ technology is to analyze consumer behavior and their interactions with retail products in real-time with the objective to provide brands and retailers the ability to achieve the following:

Table of Contents

Enhance the Consumer’s In-Store Experience

	●	Engage consumers with interactive output displays throughout brick-and-mortar retail stores to capture critical decision-making at the point of sale.

	●	Cater to specific and immediate needs of the consumer.

	●	Capture MAC address tracking data, user eye tracking, object identification of goods throughout the store.

Manage Inventory and Create Smart Planograms

	●	Assess the consumers product engagement and product tracking in real time.

	●	Aid in inventory management and product placement throughout a store by creating smart planograms.

Monetize Digital Insights

	●	Curate tailored in-store marketing solutions.

	●	Drive sales via engaging customers with digital experiences at the point of sale.

Acquisition of eyeQ

The company eyeQ was founded in 2013 and was an operating entity until December 2018, when it was acquired by Alpha Modus. At the time of acquisition, US Patent No. 10,360,571 (“the ‘571 patent”) was still a pending application. Post-acquisition, the inventors of the inventions claimed in the ‘571 patent family were engaged by Alpha Modus as advisors. Currently, Michael Garel, the eyeQ founder and a co-inventor of the inventions, is the only one of the inventors of the inventions claimed in the ‘571 patent family that continues to be an Alpha Modus advisor. Chris Chumas, Alpha Modus’ Chief Strategy Officer and a former IBM client executive, currently manages the Alpha Modus research and patent development efforts. Since acquiring eyeQ and the ‘571 application, Alpha Modus was awarded the first patent in the ‘571 patent family in July 2019. Since August of 2019, several continuation patents have been issued in the ‘571 patent family.

The ‘571 Patent Family and the uses thereof

The ‘571 patent family is based on US Patent No. 10,360,571, which issued on July 23, 2019. The ‘571 patent claims priority to a provisional patent application filed on July 19, 2013.

Table of Contents

The ‘571 patent family currently consists of the following issued patents/patent applications:

Country

Application
Number

Filing
Date

Publication
Number

Publication
Date

Patent
Number

Issue
Date

Status

Title

14/335429

18-Jul-2014

2015-0025936

22-Jan-2015

10360571

23-Jul-2019

Granted

METHOD FOR MONITORING AND ANALYZING BEHAVIOR AND USES THEREOF

16/509343

11-Jul-2019

2019-0333081

31-Oct-2019

10853825

01-Dec-2020

Granted

METHOD FOR MONITORING AND ANALYZING BEHAVIOR AND USES THEREOF

16/837577

01-Apr-2020

2020-0226621

16-Jul-2020

11049120

29-Jun-2021

Granted

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A LAYOUT FOR PLACEMENT OF PRODUCTS IN A RETAIL STORE

16/837645

01-Apr-2020

2020-0226622

16-Jul-2020

11301880

12-Apr-2022

Granted

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INVENTORY MANAGEMENT IN A RETAIL STORE

16/837711

01-Apr-2020

2020-0226623

16-Jul-2020

11042890

22-Jun-2021

Granted

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE IN A RETAIL STORE

16/985001

04-Aug-2020

2020-0364730

19-Nov-2020

10977672

13-Apr-2021

Granted

(TRACK 1) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, MARKETING, AND ADVERTISING IN A RETAIL STORE

17/590605

01-Feb-2022

2022-0156764

19-May-2022

12039550

16-Jul-2024

Granted

METHOD FOR ENHANCING CUSTOMER SHOPPING EXPERIENCE IN A RETAIL STORE

18/100377

23-Jan-2023

2023-0162211

25-May-2023

12026731

2-Jul-2024

Granted

METHOD FOR PERSONALIZED MARKETING AND ADVERTISING OF RETAIL PRODUCTS

18/519550

27-Nov-2023

2024-0095760

21-Mar-2024

12175484

24-Dec-2024

Granted

METHODS FOR PERSONALIZED MARKETING AND ADVERTISING

18/651410

30-Apr-2024

2024-0281829

22-Aug-2024

12354121

8-Jul-2025

Granted

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SHOPPING IN A RETAIL STORE

19/905975

03-Oct-2024

2025-0029124

23-Jan-2025

12423718

23-Sep-2025

Granted

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE IN A RETAIL STORE

The patents cover various inventions related to user interactions in physical locations, and based on such interactions, the displaying as ads of items or information that would potentially be relevant to the user. For example, cameras monitor customers and can understand their purchasing interests and provide offers or recommendations to a customer of similar products including coupons, sales, etc.

Table of Contents

The ‘571 patent relates to a method for monitoring and analyzing consumer behavior in real-time, particularly within retail environments. It utilizes various information monitoring devices to collect data about consumers, enhancing their shopping experience through targeted and personalized digital interactions.

The inventors of the ‘571 patent identified a critical need in the retail industry, especially brick-and-mortar stores, to adapt to the evolving shopping habits influenced by online retail and social media. The patent addresses the challenge of providing an enriched in-store experience that rivals online shopping, thus countering trends like showrooming.

The ‘571 patent describes and claims a specific method that involves using information monitoring devices, like video image devices, to gather data about shoppers. This data includes demographic characteristics (such as gender and age), sentiment, and tracking details (like movement and eye tracking). The patent details the process of analyzing this data in real-time and providing various responses, such as targeted marketing, personal engagement, or offering coupons, to enhance the shopping experience.

The ‘825 patent is directed to a method of using devices to gather information about the shopper including demographic (gender and/or age) and tracking (tracking movement by the shopper or eye tracking what the shopper is looking at), and analyzing and utilizing this information to provide real time assistance to the shopper by selecting the proper sales associate to interact with the shopper.

The ‘880 patent is directed to a method of using devices to gather information about shopper’s interactions with a product and object information of the products interacted with by the shopper and analyzing and utilizing this information and responding for inventory management.

The ‘120 patent is directed to a method of using devices to gather information about the shopper including demographic (gender and/or age) and tracking (tracking movement by the shopper or eye tracking what the shopper is looking at) and analyzing and utilizing this information to provide real time assistance to the shopper by selecting the proper sales associate to interact with the shopper.

The ‘890 patent relates to an improved method for enhancing customer assistance in retail stores through the use of advanced information monitoring systems. The inventors of the ‘890 patent recognized the need for brick-and-mortar retailers to adapt to the changing consumer behavior influenced by digital technology.

The patent offers a solution by integrating technology to analyze customer interactions with products in real-time, providing targeted assistance and enhancing the shopping experience. The ‘890 patent provides several advancements over previous methods, such as real-time analysis of customer interactions with products, including sentiment and object identification information, and utilizing this data to manage inventory and offer personalized responses.

The ‘672 patent introduces a novel system for real-time inventory management, marketing, and advertising within a retail store setting. The ‘672 patent addresses the emerging challenges in the retail sector, particularly for brick-and-mortar stores, in the context of the increasing prevalence of online shopping and the phenomenon of showrooming. The patent provides innovative solutions to enhance in-store customer experiences and counter the competitive pressures from online retail.

The inventors of the ‘672 patent recognized that there existed a significant gap in the brick-and-mortar retail sector’s ability to provide real-time, personalized experiences to customers, a feature commonly leveraged by online retailers. The patent offers a method and system that bridges this gap by utilizing technology to analyze consumer behavior and dynamically adjust marketing and inventory strategies.

The ‘550 patent is directed to a method of leveraging a customer’s metadata to enhance the customer experience and drive in-store foot-traffic.

The ‘731 patent is directed to a method of leveraging a customer’s metadata to enhance the customer experience and generate personalized advertising for a particular customer.

Table of Contents

The ‘484 patent is directed to a method that leverage artificial intelligence to deliver real-time, tailored marketing and advertising experiences at the point of decision-making.

The ‘571 patent received a patent term extension of 1,042 days and does not expire until May 25, 2037. The other patents in the family expire on July 18, 2034. Therefore, there is significant patent life remaining in the ‘571 patent family. Beginning well before the current expiration of our entire patent family, Alpha Modus intends to continue evolving with the industry and developing new concepts that support increasing revenue streams. Alpha Modus intends to expand the use of our patent family as a lever to develop a sales team to drive potential partnerships authorized under the ‘571 patent family.

Alpha Modus filed additional U.S. patent applications during 2025: (i) Patent Application No. 19/203,027 titled “Methods for Personalized Marketing of Retail Products”; (ii) Patent Application No. 19/233,507 titled “Methods for Personalized Marketing of Retail Products”; and (iii) Patent Application No. 19/309,240 titled “Methods and Systems for Providing Customer Assistance in a Retail Store.”

Alpha Modus believes the ‘571 patent and several family members are being infringed by many major retailers, service providers and consumer brands, and that the adoption of the ‘571 patent (and family) technology is occurring at an exponential pace in the retail marketplace.

Market Analysis

Alpha Modus believes it is at the center of major shifts in technology, consumer preferences and industry trends that are catalyzing the adoption of Alpha Modus’ patented solutions across its target retail markets.

There was approximately $62.35 billion U.S. retail media advertising spend in 2025, which is projected to surpass $97 billion in 2028 (eMarketer, Jan 29, 2025, https://www.emarketer.com/content/retail-media-forecast-report-update). Approximately $3.8 trillion in digitally influenced U.S. retail sales are expected in 2027, with 75% of in-store sales tied to digital engagement (Profitero+, June 17, 2025, https://www.profitero.com/blog/digitally-influenced-sales-phrase-that-unlocks-buyin-budget-for-ecommerce-leader). 53% of retailers deploy AI-powered signage, kiosks, & in-store targeting (NVIDIA, https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/Solutions/documents/retail-state-of-ai-report.pdf). Financial service kiosks for the underbanked are growing at approximately 16% CAGR (2025-2030) (Grand View Research, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/bank-kiosk-market). AI personalization will influence approximately $1.3 trillion in retail spend by 2025 (Qualtrics, March 18, 2025 https://www.qualtrics.com/news/qualtrics-report-executives-are-hesitant-to-lead-in-ai-transformation-putting-up-to-1-3-trillion-at-risk/).

Approach and Value Proposition

Upon its first notification of allowance for the ‘571 patent in July of 2019, Alpha Modus decided to focus 100% of its resources on the expansion of the technology described in the ‘571 patent. The services covered by the ‘571 patent were just beginning to be adopted by retailers. Alpha Modus’ strategy was to build out the technology, resulting in a robust patent portfolio that would serve its stakeholders better, as early thought leaders in the retail digital marketing space. Alpha Modus intends to monetize its patent portfolio through licensing over the course of the next twelve months.

Table of Contents

Ecosystem Overview

The Alpha Modus ecosystem is an intellectual property-driven environment that combines patented technologies, service infrastructure, and strategic partnerships to power scalable, defensible innovation across retail, digital engagement, and connected commerce. This ecosystem enables IP-powered innovation by integrating a robust patent portfolio with flexible licensing, a comprehensive service suite, and a growing partner network. Alpha Modus services are targeted to solution design, support and maintenance, installation and monitoring, call center support, data analytics, and strategy and planning to optimize AI retail applications. Alpha Modus’s software and technological solutions are focused on AI/machine learning, mobile applications, retail management, customer loyalty, and strategy and planning to enhance retail experiences. Alpha Modus’s hardware and infrastructure solutions are focused on tablets and displays, kiosks, and mobile devices as essential hardware components supporting AI retail technologies and customer engagement.

Competitive Advantage

Alpha Modus collaborates with retail technology and service providers to expand market reach and capabilities. The Company’s strategic alliances enable integration of diverse technologies and service offerings, and these partnerships enhance scalability and reduce friction in technology deployment.

Additionally, the Company’s robust intellectual property portfolio includes method patents across retail numerous retail use cases. Patents create defensible market positions and unlock ecosystem advantage. Alpha Modus’s technology ecosystem is designed to empower retail technologies into a unified scalable environment. Alpha Modus’ patent portfolio forms the backbone of its IP-driven ecosystem, covering core methods that power many of today’s AI applications in brick-and-mortar retail—such as smart kiosks, dynamic displays, targeted promotions, consumer analytics, and immersive in-store engagement.

Key AI-based focus areas of the Company’s technology include the following:

	●	Real-Time Inventory Management – Alert sales associates, managers, distributors or brands immediately when inventory is low or out of stock. Help prevent lost sales and improves customer satisfaction by maintaining inventory control in brick-and-mortar and at the point of purchase.
	●	Ads Based on Real-Time Customer Data – Serve customized ads or product information in real time based on customer demographic metadata such as age, gender, and emotions. Incorporate third party external data such as geo-location, weather, and events to tailor ads dynamically. Enhance customer engagement by providing relevant and timely information at the point of sale.
	●	Customer Assistance Alerts (Shrinkage/Theft Prevention) – Real-time alerts to sales associates for customers needing assistance or suspicious activities at self-checkout, improving customer satisfaction and reducing loss through proactive theft prevention.
	●	Smart Planograms – Using in-store data such as dwell time and foot traffic, AI determines optimal display layouts and product placements, improving store flow and increasing sales opportunities.
	●	Driving Traffic into Brick-and-Mortar Retail – Stores and brands can leverage customer metadata such as search history, voice, age, gender, and location to send targeted ads for in-store purchases. This customization improves the shopper’s experience by delivering relevant promotions and product recommendations directly at the point of purchase.
	●	AI-Generated Ads – Not all ads fit every customer, but brands can use customer data and images to generate targeted and customized ads at the point of purchase. This approach is targeted to enhance the customer experience and drive improved sales by showing the right message to the right audience at the right time.

Recent Developments

On January 11, 2024, Alpha Modus entered into a license agreement with GZ6G Technologies Corp. (“GZ6G”), which gives GZ6G the right to use Alpha Modus’ patented intellectual property, and pertains to GZ6G’s promotional, advertising, and operational functions, including co-development arrangements with Alpha Modus for AI-driven advertising solutions for stadiums and event management.

On April 10, 2024, Alpha Modus entered into a license agreement with Xalles Holdings Inc. and its subsidiary, CashXAI Inc. (“CashX”), which gave CashX the exclusive right to use all of Alpha Modus’s patented intellectual property in connection with CashX’s promotional, advertising, and operational functions, including co-development arrangements with Alpha Modus, in connection with self-service kiosks located in retail food, drug and convenience stores for the purpose of serving unbanked and underbanked consumers, by offering banking, phone and insurance solutions to the consumer. An “unbanked” consumer means a person that does not have a checking or savings account with an FDIC-insured institution, and an “underbanked” consumer means a person that has or had a checking or savings account with an FDIC-insured institution, but regularly uses non-traditional banks such as Venmo or the Cash App, or lenders such as a check cashing company or payday lender. On July 21, 2025, the parties entered into a new agreement, but on or about September 12, 2025, Alpha Modus terminated the agreement with CashX.

Table of Contents

Alpha Modus is continuing its efforts to provide mobile, kiosk, back office, and prepaid card services in the United States through its subsidiary, Alpha Modus Financial Services, LLC. Alpha Modus’s Financial Services division is focused on providing services to the underbanked via kiosks placed in retail locations, as well as a mobile application. The Company is targeting a national deployment of kiosks and a mobile application to support underbanked populations. Services include check cashing, money transfer and bill payments. Additional offerings such as gift cards, event tickets, and mobile top ups are anticipated. Comprehensive setup, installation, maintenance, and ongoing support of kiosks is anticipated to ensure service reliability.

Alpha Modus’s strategic alliance with VSBLTY is focused on the use of data and AI in retail settings to enhance the customer experience. VSBLTY offerings include the following: VisionCaptor™ uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to deliver targeted display content at the point of purchase. DataCaptor™ leverages camera and sensor technology through AI tools, enabling real-time analytics and anonymous audience data based on who and what the camera sees. VSBLTY Metrics offers industry-leading measurement that can validate media impressions at the point of sale.

In November 2025, Alpha Modus entered into a confidential patent license and authorized reseller agreement with a U.S.-based technology integrator to expand the reach of Alpha Modus’s AI-driven retail-intelligence ecosystem. The agreement strengthens the Company’s commercialization strategy by enabling qualified partners to integrate, promote, and deploy Alpha Modus’s patented technologies across a broader national footprint. Under the intellectual property license, the technology integrator received a non-exclusive, worldwide license to practice defined Alpha Modus patents covering real-time shopper analytics, in-store assistance, and personalized retail engagement. In consideration, the partner will remit a 10% royalty on gross revenues derived from customer licensed products, with quarterly reporting and payment terms. Reciprocally, Alpha Modus became a non-exclusive reseller of the partner’s digital-signage platform and related services under commercial terms that include a 30% discount from prevailing public pricing. This reciprocal framework establishes mutual market access allowing Alpha Modus to deliver its AI-powered engagement capabilities through integrated display networks while extending its partners’ reach into data-driven retail environments.

Alpha Modus intends to continue its intellectual property licensing and enforcement efforts in 2026. No assurances can be given that any of these plans will come to fruition or that, if implemented, they will necessarily yield positive results.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of commercial operations in the normal course of business. As of the Closing Date, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations except as set forth below.

On January 16, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against The Kroger Company alleging patent infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to the Company’s ‘571 patent portfolio encompassing retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumer’s in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-00022), and the case has since been settled.

On November 12, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Brookshire Grocery Co. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-00919), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.

Table of Contents

On December 17, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Wakefern Food Corporation and Shelf Nine LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-01056), and the case has since been settled.

On February 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Walgreen Co. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2025-cv-00120), and the case has since been settled.

On April 15, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Optisigns, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Case No. 4:2025-cv-01727), and the case has since been settled.

On August 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Cooler Screens, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, and ‘890 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 1:25-cv-10004), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On August 25, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00868), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On August 29, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against The Kroger Company alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00923), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On September 4, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Creative Realities, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, 825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-009311), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On September 10, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against MNTN, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, 890 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case No. 1:25-cv-01466), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On September 12, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Allerin Tech Pvt. Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00947), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

Table of Contents

On September 18, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Mood Media LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case No. 1:25-cv-01527), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On September 24, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against RetailNext Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘550 patent, and ‘890 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00977). and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On October 2, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Navori SA and meldCX Pty Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01000). and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On October 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Sensormatic Electronics, LLC and Johnson Controls International, PLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01003). and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On October 8, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘550 patent, which encompass systems for real-time inventory management, customer assistance, personalized in-store advertising, dynamic store layout optimization, and behavioral data-driven retail engagement. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01026), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On October 22, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against 7-Eleven, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01060), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On November 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Adroit Worldwide Media, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 8:25-cv-02471), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On November 12, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Atliq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘550 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01120), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

Table of Contents

On November 14, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Industria De Diseño Textil, S.A., and Zara USA, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01125), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On November 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against V-Count Global Holding Ltd., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘550 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01145), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On November 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Stratacache, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 2:25-cv-11234), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

On December 1, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against H&M Fashion USA, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121, which encompass methods and systems for monitoring shopper behavior, analyzing product interactions, optimizing product placement, managing inventory in real time, and enabling seamless in-store purchase experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01182), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.

Facilities

Alpha Modus’ headquarters is a virtual facility with an address in Cornelius, North Carolina. Having a virtual headquarters has allowed Alpha Modus to operate with minimal overhead that was not needed to support its current staff. Operations, research and development functions are currently conducted virtually, and Alpha Modus believes its current virtual facility is adequate and suitable for its current needs. Alpha Modus’ plans to expand licensing the ‘571 family of patents through a small internal sales team will require Alpha Modus to secure a suitable alternative space to accommodate its operations.

Corporate Information

Alpha Modus’ principal executive offices are located at 20311 Chartwell Center Drive, #1469, Cornelius, North Carolina, 28031. Alpha Modus’ website address is www.AlphaModus.com. Information contained on or accessible through Alpha Modus’ website is not a part of this prospectus, and the inclusion of Alpha Modus’ website address in this proxy statement/prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.

2024 Business Combination

The Company was originally incorporated in Delaware on April 20, 2021, as a special purpose acquisition company under the name “Insight Acquisition Corp.” (“INAQ”). On October 13, 2023, the Company and Alpha Modus, Corp. entered into the Business Combination Agreement, which was subsequently amended on June 21, 2024. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, as amended, Alpha Modus, Corp., and the Company agreed that (i) each share of Alpha Modus, Corp. common stock (other than those properly exercising any applicable appraisal rights under applicable law) would be converted into (A) one share of Company common stock, and (B) the contingent right to receive a pro rata portion of the Earnout Shares (as defined below) (which may be zero); and (iii) each share of Alpha Modus, Corp. preferred stock (other than those properly exercising any applicable appraisal rights under applicable law) would be converted into (A) one share of Company Series C Preferred Stock, and (B) the contingent right to receive a pro rata portion of the Earnout Shares (as defined below) (which may be zero) (collectively the “Merger Consideration”).

Table of Contents

The stockholders of Alpha Modus, Corp. may be issued up to 2,200,000 additional shares of Company common stock (the “Earnout Shares”). The Earnout Shares will be earned and issued in one-third (1/3) increments (of approximately 733,333 shares) if, for any twenty (20) trading days within any thirty (30)-consecutive trading day period beginning at least 180 days after the Closing and on or prior to the 5-year anniversary of the Closing, the VWAP of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $13.00 per share, $15.00 per share and $18.00 per share (as equitably adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, recapitalizations and the like after the Closing), respectively, with all remaining Earnout Shares earned and issued upon certain changes of control of the Company at or prior to the 5-year anniversary of the Closing.

Additionally, at the Closing, the Company’s sponsor, Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC (the “Sponsor”) was required to deposit 750,000 shares of Company common stock into escrow (the “Sponsor Earnout Shares”), and the Sponsor Earnout Shares will be released to the Sponsor according to the same milestones and timelines applicable to the Earnout Shares described above. Additionally, the Company and the Sponsor agreed that the Sponsor will forfeit and cancel 750,000 shares of Company common stock at Closing. Finally, at the Closing, (i) the Company will to use its best efforts to pay off the Company’s loan(s) from Polar Multi-Strategy Master Fund (“Polar”) (expected to be approximately $975,000 at Closing), (ii) the Company will use its best efforts to pay Alpha Modus, Corp.’s loans from Janbella Group, LLC (“Janbella”) (expected to be approximately $1,400,000 at Closing), (iii) the Company will issue to Janbella 1,392,308 shares of Company common stock, (iv) the Company will issue to Michael Singer 125,000 shares of Company common stock, (v) the Company will issue to Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) 210,000 shares of Company common stock, and (vi) the Company will issue to Odeon Capital Group, LLC (“Odeon”) 90,000 shares of Company common stock.

Cantor, the representative of the underwriters in the Company’s original IPO in September 2021, was entitled to a deferred underwriting commission upon the closing of the Business Combination of $6,600,000, which amount was not subject to change based on redemption levels. On June 20, 2024, Cantor and Odeon entered into fee modification agreements with the Company pursuant to which (i) Cantor would be issued 210,000 shares of Company common stock and Odeon would be issued 90,000 shares of Company common stock at the closing of the Business Combination, and (ii) Cantor and Odeon would waive the right to any further underwriting commissions or other payments by the Company under its Underwriting Agreement with them, subject to the other terms of those fee modification agreements.

On October 29, 2024, Company stockholders approved the Business Combination and other transactions and proposal presented within the proxy statement/prospectus in connection with Business Combination transactions.

Financing in Connection with Business Combination

On October 23, 2024, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Streeterville Capital, LLC (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Company would sell, and the Investor would purchase, a secured convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $2,890,000 (the “Note” or the “Convertible Note”) for a net purchase price of $2,600,000 (after deducting an original issue discount of $260,000, and payment of $30,000 for the Investor’s legal, accounting, due diligence, asset monitoring, and other transaction expenses).

The SPA included customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The SPA granted the Investor (i) the right to fund up to an additional $5,000,000 to the Company, with the Company’s consent, through the date that is six months following repayment of the Note in full (the “Reinvestment Right”), and (ii) the exclusive right, on customary market terms, to enter into an equity line of credit or other similar financing arrangement with the Company for at least $20,000,000, through the date that is one year following the Purchase Price Date (defined below). Pursuant the SPA, Alpha Modus, Corp. was required to guarantee all of the Company’s obligations under the Note and related transaction documents pursuant to a guaranty agreement (the “Guaranty”), and the Note will also be secured by security agreements (the “Security Agreements”) by and between the Investor and both the Company and Alpha Modus, Corp., granting the Investor first priority security interests in all assets of the Company, as well as all assets of Alpha Modus, Corp., including all of Alpha Modus’ intellectual property (and including Alpha Modus’ patent portfolio) pursuant to a separate intellectual property security agreement (the “IP Security Agreement”). Additionally, the Company and Alpha Modus (collectively the “Borrowers”), and William Alessi, his entity, Janbella Group, LLC, and the trusts deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Alessi (each a “Capital Party” and collectively the “Capital Parties”), were required to execute at closing a subordination and voting agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) all of the Borrowers’ indebtedness and obligations to each Capital Party were subordinated to Investor, (ii) all security interests of any Capital Party were subordinate to Investor’s security interests, (iii) the Borrowers would not make any payments to any Capital Party, (iv) none of the Capital Parties would accelerate any subordinated debt or equity, (v) and no Capital Party would convert or exchange their preferred stock of the Company into Common Stock, until such time as the Investor had been fully paid and all financing agreements between the Investor and the Borrowers were terminated.

Table of Contents

The Note matured 18 months following the date the purchase price is delivered to the Company (the “Purchase Price Date”), accrued interest of 10% per annum, was prepayable (after providing five trading days’ notice) at a 20% premium to the then-outstanding balance of the Note, and was convertible into Class A common stock (“Common Stock”) of the Company as described below. Within 30 days of the Purchase Price Date, the Company was obligated to file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC registering a number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Note, and such registration statement was filed as described below.

The Note was convertible at the election of the Investor into shares of Common Stock at any time following the earlier of the effective date of the registration statement described above or one year following the Purchase Price Date, at a conversion price equal to 90% multiplied by the lowest daily volume-weighted average price during the five trading days preceding conversion, and provided that (i) the Investor may not convert the Note into shares of Common Stock to the extent that such conversion would result in the Investor’s beneficial ownership of Common Stock being in excess of 4.99% (or 9.99% if the Company’s market capitalization is less than $10 million), and provided that (ii) the Note is not convertible into a total cumulative number of shares of Common Stock in excess of the number of shares of Common Stock permitted by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635 (the “Exchange Cap”). Pursuant to the terms of the Note, the Company was required to, within 120 days of the Purchase Price Date, seek shareholder approval of the Note and the issuance of shares of Common Stock, issuable upon conversion of the Note and pursuant to the Reinvestment Right, in excess of the Exchange Cap (the “Shareholder Approvals”). If such shareholder approval is not obtained within 120 days, the Company was required to continue to seek shareholder approval every three months thereafter until shareholder approval is obtained. Pursuant to the Subordination Agreement, each Capital Party was required to vote all of their shares of Company stock in favor of the Shareholder Approvals. Under the SPA, the Company was required to initially reserve 7,500,000 shares of its Common Stock for issuance to the Investor under the Note, and the Company was required to add additional shares to the reserve in increments of 100,000 shares when requested by the Investor if at the time of the request the number of shares being held in reserve is less than three times the number of shares of Common Stock equal to the outstanding balance under the Note divided by the applicable conversion price at that time.

On December 12, 2024, the Company amended the SPA (the “Amended SPA”) to revise the terms of the Note. Pursuant to the Amended SPA, the Note was not convertible below a floor price of $4.00/share, but if the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock is less than the floor price for ten consecutive trading days, the Company is required to begin making monthly payments under the Note on the date that is 90 days following the original funding date.

On or about December 13, 2024, the Company issued the Note to the Investor, the Note was funded on or about December 16, 2024, and the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock was subsequently less than the $4.00 floor price for more than ten consecutive trading days, which, under the terms of the Amended SPA, would have required the Company to begin making monthly payments under the Note, with those monthly payments commencing on March 16, 2025, and with those monthly payments being equal to 120% multiplied by the outstanding balance divided by the lesser of 6 or the number of months remaining until the Note’s maturity date.

On January 27, 2025, the Company and the Investor entered into an amendment to the Note providing that (i) the Company was not required to begin making monthly payments under the Note until May 16, 2025, (ii) the monthly payments will equal $485,000.00 plus all accrued but unpaid interest, multiplied by 120%, and (iii) the Company would pay to the Investor 50% of all proceeds received by the Company from any equity line of credit or similar arrangement within one trading day of receipt by the Company.

Table of Contents

On April 28, 2025, the Company and the Investor entered into a second amendment to the Note (the “Second Amendment”) providing that (i) the 20% prepayment penalty under the Note was eliminated, but the outstanding balance of the Note was increased to $3,597,501.71 (i.e., the outstanding balance under the Note as of April 28, 2025, plus the prepayment penalty of 20% as of April 28, 2025), (ii) the Company would have the right on up to three occasions to extend the monthly payment start date for one month, with the outstanding balance automatically increasing by one percent for each extension, (iii) the monthly payments would equal $582,000 plus all accrued but unpaid interest, (iv) the floor price was reduced to $1.25, (v) the Investor’s beneficial ownership limitation was increased to 9.99%, (vi) the Company agreed to hold a stockholder meeting within 60 days to approve the issuances to the Investor under the Note and under an equity line of credit agreement with the Investor in excess of the Exchange Cap (as such term was defined in the Note), (vii) the Company agreed to sell the Investor 1,250,000 shares of common stock (the “Pre-Delivery Shares”) for $125, which Pre-Delivery Shares shall be used by the Investor only as pre-delivery shares under the Note and a future equity line of credit agreement between the Company and the Investor, (viii) the Company agreed to file a registration statement to register the Pre-Delivery Shares and other shares of common stock issuable to the Investor upon conversion of the Note, and (ix) the Investor provided its written consent to the Company entering into the Patent Monetization Agreement and Option Agreement described below.

A registration statement registering shares for resale by the Investor was filed by the Company with the SEC pursuant to the Company’s obligations under the Second Amendment to register Pre-Delivery Shares and other shares of common stock issuable to the Investor upon conversion of the Note (of which 1,250,000 Pre-Delivery Shares and 3,000,000 other conversion shares were registered for resale in that registration statement). That registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on May 23, 2025. On May 29, 2025, the Investor converted $767,000 of the Note into 613,600 shares of Company common stock. On June 11, 2025, the Investor converted $125,000 of the Note into 100,000 shares of Company common stock. On July 10, 2025, the Investor converted $162,500 of the Note into 130,000 shares of Company common stock. On July 16, 2025, the Investor converted $150,000 of the Note into 120,000 shares of Company common stock. On July 23, 2025, the Investor converted an aggregate of $2,545,500 of the Note into 2,036,400 shares of Company common stock, leaving a balance due to the Investor under the Note of approximately $11,312.28, which the Company paid on July 23, 2025, satisfying the note in full. On or about July 25, 2025, the Company repurchased the 1,250,000 Pre-Delivery Shares from the Investor for $125, and on or about August 6, 2025, the Pre-Delivery Shares were returned to the Company by the Investor and cancelled.

Business Combination Closing

On December 13, 2024, the parties to the Business Combination Agreement consummated the Business Combination, and in connection with closing issued the Note to the Investor, and entered into the Guaranty, Security Agreements, IP Security Agreement, and Subordination Agreement. Immediately upon the consummation of the Business Combination, Alpha Modus, Corp. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the Company changed its name to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.,” and the Company is now listed on Nasdaq under the symbol “AMOD”. The Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Under this method of accounting, INAQ is treated as the acquired company for financial statement reporting purposes. See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information and Other Data.” Legacy Alpha Modus’s financial statements for previous periods will be disclosed in the Company’s future periodic reports filed with the SEC.

In connection with the Business Combination, approximately 426,136 shares of common stock were redeemed, which represented a significant portion of the publicly traded shares outstanding immediately prior to the Business Combination and resulted in only approximately $1.16 million of cash from the INAQ trust account becoming available to Alpha Modus in connection with the closing of the Business Combination. In the Business Combination, the Company issued 5,295,000 shares of common stock and 7,500,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to Legacy Alpha Modus’s shareholders as merger consideration in the Business Combination, and the Company issued 1,817,308 shares of common stock to various parties as required by the Business Combination Agreement. Immediately following the Business Combination, including the redemption of shares described above, there were 12,455,252 shares of the Company’s common stock (all Class A common stock) issued and outstanding, and 7,500,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.

As a result of becoming a publicly traded company, we will need to hire additional personnel and implement procedures and processes to address public company regulatory requirements and customary practices. We expect to incur additional annual expenses as a public company for, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees and additional internal and external accounting and legal and administrative resources, including increased audit and legal fees.

Table of Contents

Other Recent Developments

On April 28, 2025, the Company entered into a Patent Monetization Agreement (the “Patent Monetization Agreement”) with Alpha Modus Ventures, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company controlled by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, William Alessi (“AMV”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to provide litigation funding to AMV in connection with AMV’s recently filed patent litigation suit against Broadcom Inc. for infringement of AMV’s patents relating to methods and apparatus for transporting of fibre channel data over ethernet (U.S. Patent Nos. 11,108,591, 11,303,473, and 11,310,077), and the parties agreed that the gross proceeds from the litigation would first be paid to the Company until it has received the return of amounts funded for the litigation, and then 65% to the Company until it has received a five times return, then 45% to the Company until it has received an additional two times return, and then 35% to the Company.

On April 28, 2025, and in connection with entering into the Patent Monetization Agreement, the Company entered into an Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with AMV’s owners (Janbella Group, LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Alessi, and Chris Chumas, the Company’s Chief Sales Officer), pursuant to which the Company received the right to acquire AMV from its owners for an option exercise price consisting of the following: (i) the termination by the Company of the Patent Monetization Agreement and AMV’s related payment obligations to the Company under the Patent Monetization Agreement, (ii) the payment of $300,000 to Janbella Group, LLC (in satisfaction of which Janbella Group, LLC will release AMV of its $300,000 repayment obligation to Janbella Group, LLC) as soon as the Investor (defined above) has been repaid in full, and (iii) the issuance by the Company to AMV’s owners in the aggregate of a number of shares of common stock equal to $35,000,000 divided by the closing price of the Company’s common stock immediately prior to closing, which closing shall not occur until the Company’s shareholders have approved such transaction and issuance of common stock as required by Nasdaq’s listing rules.

The Company has not made any payments or assisted with any litigation funding under the Patent Monetization Agreement, and the Company does not expect to receive any payments under that agreement, nor does it expect to exercise any right to acquire AMV pursuant to the Option Agreement.

On May 27, 2025, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with four family trusts of the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, pursuant to which the trusts would exchange an aggregate of 3,200,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (800,000 shares held in the name of The WRA 2023 Irrevocable Trust, 800,000 shares held in the name of The Janet Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, 800,000 shares held in the name of The Isabella Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, and 800,000 shares held in the name of The Kim Alessi Richter Irrevocable Trust, all of which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Alessi as Mr. Alessi’s spouse is the trustee of each of the trusts) for an aggregate of 26,079,868 shares of Class A common stock (with each of the trusts being issued 6,519,967 shares of common stock). In the Exchange Agreement, each of the trusts agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the shares of common stock to be received in the exchange until June 13, 2026 (except for permitted transfers to an affiliate). On or about June 29, 2025, the trusts’ 3,200,000 preferred shares were cancelled, and 26,079,868 shares of common stock were issued to the trusts.

On July 15, 2025, the Company issued a promissory note to The Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, one of the family trusts of the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, in the original principal amount of $2,142,857, in consideration of $1,500,000 in funding received by the Company from the ender on or about July 10, 2025. The note accrues interest at eight percent (8%) per annum, matures on April 30, 2026, and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at a $5.00 per share conversion price.

As described above, as of July 23, 2025, the note issued to Streeterville Capital, LLC had been fully satisfied.

Table of Contents

On September 16, 2025, the Company issued a promissory note to The Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, one of the family trusts of the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, in the original principal amount of $714,286, in consideration of $500,000 in funding received by the Company from the Lender on or about September 16, 2025. The note accrues interest at eight percent (8%) per annum, matures on September 15, 2026, and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at a $5.00 per share conversion price.

Effective October 19, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Haase-Dubosc Securities Purchase Agreement”) with the Nancy Helen Wallace and Gerard Haase-Dubosc Family Trust (the “Haase-Dubosc Trust”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) a convertible promissory note to the Haase-Dubosc Trust in the original principal amount of $400,000 (the “Haase-Dubosc Note”), and (ii) warrants to purchase 363,636 shares of Company Class A common stock at an exercise price of $1.10/share, for a total purchase price of $400,000 (the “Haase-Dubosc Warrants”). The Haase-Dubosc Note accrues interest at 7% per annum, matures on October 15, 2026, and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at any time 6 months following issuance of the note at a fixed, non-variable conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day volume-weighted average price on the first trading day following issuance of the note, or $0.896/share. The Haase-Dubosc Note and Haase-Dubosc Warrants were issued to the Haase-Dubosc Trust on October 19, 2025.

Effective December 2, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with AIFirst Ventures LLC (“AIFirst”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) a convertible promissory note to AIFirst in the original principal amount of $250,000 (the “AIFirst Note”), and (ii) a common stock purchase warrant to AIFirst to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Company Class A common stock at an exercise price of $1.00/share (the “AIFirst Warrant”), for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000. The AIFirst Note does not accrue interest, matures on October 30, 2026, and is convertible into shares of Class A common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at any time 6 months following issuance of the note at a fixed, non-variable conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day volume-weighted average price on the first trading day following issuance of the note (or $0.617, based on the 5-day volume-weighted average price on December 3, 2025, of approximately $0.771). The purchase price was paid by AIFirst to the Company on December 2, 2025, and the AIFirst Note and AIFirst Warrant were issued by the Company to AIFirst effective as of December 2, 2025.

Effective December 30, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with Alexander Haase-Dubosc, pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible promissory note to the investor in the original principal amount of $110,000 for a purchase price of $100,000. The note accrues interest at 7% per annum, matures on December 29, 2026, and is convertible into shares of Class A common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at any time 6 months following issuance of the note at a fixed, non-variable conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day volume-weighted average price on the first trading day following issuance of the Note (the 5-day VWAP on December 31, 2025). The purchase price was paid by the investor to the Company on December 30, 2025, and the note was issued by the Company to the investor effective as of December 30, 2025.

Emerging Growth Company

Smaller Reporting Company

Controlled Company

Table of Contents

Use of Proceeds

We will retain broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from the sale of the securities offered hereby. Except as described in any prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be provided to you, we currently intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the securities offered hereby for general corporate purposes, which may include capital expenditures, working capital and general and administrative expenses. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses and products that are complementary to our own, although we have no current plans, commitments or agreements with respect to any acquisitions as of the date of this prospectus. We will set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement or free writing prospectus our intended use for the net proceeds received from the sale of any securities sold pursuant to the prospectus supplement or free writing prospectus. Pending these uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds primarily in money market mutual funds, obligations of the U.S. government and its agencies, money market instruments including commercial paper and negotiable certificates of deposit and corporate bonds.

We will bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred in effecting the registration of the securities covered by this prospectus, including all registration and filing fees, Nasdaq listing fees, fees and expenses of our counsel and our independent registered public accounting firm, and all internal expenses of the Company (the “Registration Expenses”).

Table of Contents

Description of COMMON STOCK AND RELATED MATTERS

The following summary of the material terms of the Company’s securities is not intended to be a complete summary of the rights and preferences of such securities. We urge you to read the DGCL and the Amended and Restated Charter in its entirety for a complete description of the rights and preferences of the Company’s securities.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Charter, our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 8,500,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 7,500,000 shares of which have been designated as Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and 1,000,000 shares of which will remain undesignated preferred stock. The following description summarizes the material terms of the capital stock of the Company. Because it is only a summary, it may not contain all the information that is important to you.

Common Stock

At the closing of the Business Combination, all outstanding shares of Class B common stock were converted into Class A common stock in accordance with the Amended and Restated Charter on a 1-for-1 basis, and all outstanding shares of common stock were Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, which shares are referred to herein as “common stock.”

Immediately after the Closing of the Business Combination, the Company had a total of 12,455,252 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. As of January 2, 2026, the Company had a total of 41,959,958 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Common stockholders of record are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. Unless specified in the Amended and Restated Charter or the Company’s Bylaws, or as required by applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules, the affirmative vote of a majority of our shares of common stock that are voted is required to approve any such matter voted on by our stockholders.

Preferred Stock

The Amended and Restated Charter authorizes the issuance of 8,500,000 shares of preferred stock, 7,500,000 shares of which have been designated as Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and 1,000,000 shares of which will be undesignated. As of January 2, 2026, 4,300,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock are outstanding.

The Series C Preferred Stock has the following rights:

	I.	Ranking. The Series C Preferred Stock will rank senior to the Company common stock and other classes of preferred stock with respect to rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution.

	II.	Voting. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to the vote of the Company’s shareholders;

III.

Dividends. The Series C Preferred Stock shall be treated pari passu with the Company common stock except that the dividends per share payable on the Series C Preferred Stock shall equal the dividend per share declared on each share of common stock multiplied by $10.00 (the “Face Value”) and divided by the applicable Conversion Price (as defined below). “Conversion Price” means a price per share equal to the lesser of either the Face Value, or (a) if no Trigger Event (as defined below) has occurred, 100% of the average of the 5 lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the 10 days preceding the conversion notice date (the “Measurement Period”), not to exceed 100% of the lowest sales price on the last day of the Measurement Period, or (b) following any Trigger Event, 50.0% of the average of the lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the Measurement Period, not to exceed 50.0% of the lowest sales price on the last day of such Measurement Period. “Trigger Event” generally means (a) a failure of a holder of Series C Preferred Stock to receive conversion shares when required or any agreement between the Company and the Series C Preferred Stockholder that is either (x) related to the payment of cash or delivery of conversion shares, or (y) curable, has not occurred before, and is not cured within 5 trading days of notice; (c) the Company’s suspension from trading or delisting from its principal trading exchange or market; (d) notification of an intention for the Company or its transfer agent not to comply with a conversion notice; (e) the Company’s bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation or similar proceedings; (f) the appointment of a custodian, receiver or similar official for the Company; (g) the entry of judgments against the Company in excess of $500,000 which are not stayed or satisfied within 30 days of entry; (h) the Company’s failure to comply with reporting requirements of Securities Exchange Act; (i) the initiation of any regulatory, administrative or enforcement proceeding against the Company; or (j) any material provision of the designation of the Series C Preferred Stock ceases to be valid or is contested.

Table of Contents

	IV.	Liquidation. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of Series C Preferred Stock shall be paid the Face Value per share, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends (the “Liquidation Value”).

	V.	Redemption. The Company shall be obligated to pay holders the Liquidation Value to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined below) or Trigger Event (as defined below). “Deemed Liquidation Event” generally means (a) a merger or consolidation where the Company or a subsidiary is a party to the merger and the Company issues shares of stock (except for domicile mergers and mergers not constituting a change of control); (b) the Company issues convertible or equity securities that senior to the Series C Preferred Stock in any respect; (c) a holder does not receive conversion shares upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock within 5 trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of the Company; (d) trading of the common stock is halted or suspended for 10 or more consecutive trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of the Company; or (e) a sale or other disposition of substantially all the assets of the Company that is not approved by the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock.

VI.

Conversion. Shares of Series C Preferred Stock are not convertible until 18 months following Closing of the Business Combination so long as a Trigger Event has not occurred. Beginning 18 months following Closing of the Business Combination, or following the occurrence of a Trigger Event, shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible at election of the holder at the then-applicable Conversion Price.

The Amended and Restated Charter provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. Our board of directors will be authorized to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences, the relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, applicable to the shares of each series of preferred stock. Our board of directors will be able to, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the common stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us or the removal of existing management. We have 4,300,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding at the date hereof. Although we do not currently intend to issue any shares of preferred stock other than the 4,300,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, we cannot assure you that we will not do so in the future.

Public Warrants

Each Public Warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of Company common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time commencing 30 days after the Closing. The Public Warrants will expire five years after the Closing of the Business Combination, at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.

We will not be obligated to deliver any shares of Company common stock pursuant to the exercise of a Public Warrant and will have no obligation to settle such warrant exercise unless a registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of Company common stock underlying the warrants is then effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current, subject to our satisfying our obligations described below with respect to registration. No warrant will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of Company common stock upon exercise of a warrant unless the Company common stock issuable upon such warrant exercise has been registered, qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the registered holder of the warrants. In the event that the conditions in the two immediately preceding sentences are not satisfied with respect to a Public Warrant, the holder of such warrant will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant.

Table of Contents

We are not registering the shares of Company common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants at this time. However, we have agreed that as soon as practicable, we will use our best efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement covering the shares of Company common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, to cause such registration statement to become effective and to maintain a current prospectus relating to those shares of Company common stock until the warrants expire or are redeemed, as specified in the warrant agreement. If a registration statement covering the shares of Company common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective by the 60^th business day after the Closing of the Business Combination, warrantholders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we will have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a registration statement covering the Company common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective within a specified period following the Closing of the Business Combination, warrantholders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we shall have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a cashless basis pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act, provided that such exemption is available. If that exemption, or another exemption, is not available, holders will not be able to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis.

Once the Public Warrants become exercisable, we may call the warrants for redemption:

	●	in whole and not in part;

	●	at a price of $0.01 per warrant;

	●	upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each warrantholder; and

	●	if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the Company common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending three business days before we send the notice of redemption to the warrantholders.

As of January 2, 2026, the sales price of the Company common stock did not exceed the threshold that would allow the Company to redeem the Public Warrants.

If and when the Public Warrants become redeemable by us, we may not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration or qualification.

We have established the last of the redemption criteria discussed above to prevent a redemption call unless there is at the time of the call a significant premium to the warrant exercise price. If the foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice of redemption of the Public Warrants, each warrantholder will be entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the scheduled redemption date. However, the price of the Company common stock may fall below the $18.00 redemption trigger price (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) as well as the $11.50 warrant exercise price after the redemption notice is issued.

If we call the Public Warrants for redemption as described above, our management will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise its warrant to do so on a “cashless basis.” In determining whether to require all holders to exercise their warrants on a “cashless basis,” our management will consider, among other factors, our cash position, the number of warrants that are outstanding and the dilutive effect on our stockholders of issuing the maximum number of shares of Company common stock issuable upon the exercise of our warrants. If our management takes advantage of this option, all holders of Public Warrants would pay the exercise price by surrendering their warrants for that number of shares of Company common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of Company common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the “fair market value” (defined below) by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the Company common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants. If our management takes advantage of this option, the notice of redemption will contain the information necessary to calculate the number of shares of Company common stock to be received upon exercise of the Public Warrants, including the “fair market value” in such case. Requiring a cashless exercise in this manner will reduce the number of shares to be issued and thereby lessen the dilutive effect of a warrant redemption. We believe this feature is an attractive option to us if we do not need the cash from the exercise of the warrants after the Closing. If we call our Public Warrants for redemption and our management does not take advantage of this option, Sponsor and its permitted transferees would still be entitled to exercise their Private Placement Warrants for cash or on a cashless basis using the same formula described above that other warrantholders would have been required to use had all warrantholders been required to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, as described in more detail below.

Table of Contents

A holder of a Public Warrant may notify us in writing in the event it elects to be subject to a requirement that such holder will not have the right to exercise such warrant, to the extent that after giving effect to such exercise, such person (together with such person’s affiliates), to the warrant agent’s actual knowledge, would beneficially own in excess of 4.9% or 9.8% (or such other amount as a holder may specify) of the shares of Company common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.

If the number of outstanding shares of Company common stock is increased by a stock dividend payable in shares of Company common stock, or by a split-up of shares of Company common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number of shares of Company common stock issuable on exercise of each Public Warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstanding shares of Company common stock. A rights offering to holders of Company common stock entitling holders to purchase shares of Company common stock at a price less than the fair market value will be deemed a stock dividend of a number of shares of Company common stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Company common stock actually sold in such rights offering (or issuable under any other equity securities sold in such rights offering that are convertible into or exercisable for Company common stock) and (ii) one (1) minus the quotient of (x) the price per share of Company common stock paid in such rights offering divided by (y) the fair market value. For these purposes (i) if the rights offering is for securities convertible into or exercisable for Company common stock, in determining the price payable for Company common stock, there will be taken into account any consideration received for such rights, as well as any additional amount payable upon exercise or conversion and (ii) fair market value means the volume weighted average price of Company common stock as reported during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the first date on which the shares of Company common stock trade on the applicable exchange or in the applicable market, regular way, without the right to receive such rights.

In addition, if we, at any time while the Public Warrants are outstanding and unexpired, pay a dividend or make a distribution in cash, securities or other assets to the holders of Company common stock on account of such shares of Company common stock (or other shares of our capital stock into which the warrants are convertible), other than (a) as described above, (b) certain ordinary cash dividends, (c) to satisfy the redemption rights of the holders of Company common stock in connection with the Closing of the Business Combination, (d) to satisfy the redemption rights of the holders of Company common stock in connection with a stockholder vote to amend and restate the IAC Charter (i) for an extension, or (ii) with respect to any other provision relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity, or (e) in connection with the redemption of our public shares upon our failure to complete our initial business combination, then the warrant exercise price will be decreased, effective immediately after the effective date of such event, by the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of any securities or other assets paid on each share of Company common stock in respect of such event.

If the number of outstanding shares of our Company common stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of Company common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split, reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of Company common stock issuable on exercise of each Public Warrant will be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares of Company common stock.

Whenever the number of shares of Company common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the Public Warrants is adjusted, as described above, the warrant exercise price will be adjusted by multiplying the warrant exercise price immediately prior to such adjustment by a fraction (x) the numerator of which will be the number of shares of Company common stock purchasable upon the exercise of the warrants immediately prior to such adjustment, and (y) the denominator of which will be the number of shares of Company common stock so purchasable immediately thereafter.

Table of Contents

In case of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of Company common stock (other than those described above or that solely affects the par value of such shares of Company common stock), or in the case of any merger or consolidation of us with or into another corporation (other than a consolidation or merger in which we are the continuing corporation and that does not result in any reclassification or reorganization of our outstanding shares of Company common stock), or in the case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or entity of the assets or other property of us as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in connection with which we are dissolved, the holders of the Public Warrants will thereafter have the right to purchase and receive, upon the basis and upon the terms and conditions specified in the warrants and in lieu of the shares of our Company common stock immediately theretofore purchasable and receivable upon the exercise of the rights represented thereby, the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or property (including cash) receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, merger or consolidation, or upon a dissolution following any such sale or transfer, that the holder of the warrants would have received if such holder had exercised their warrants immediately prior to such event. If less than 70% of the consideration receivable by the holders of Company common stock in such a transaction is payable in the form of Company common stock in the successor entity that is listed for trading on a national securities exchange or is quoted in an established over-the-counter market, or is to be so listed for trading or quoted immediately following such event, and if the registered holder of the warrant properly exercises the warrant within thirty days following public disclosure of such transaction, the warrant exercise price will be reduced as specified in the warrant agreement based on the Black-Scholes value (as defined in the warrant agreement) of the warrant. The purpose of such exercise price reduction is to provide additional value to holders of the warrants when an extraordinary transaction occurs during the exercise period of the warrants pursuant to which the holders of the warrants otherwise do not receive the full potential value of the warrants in order to determine and realize the option value component of the warrant. This formula is to compensate the warrantholder for the loss of the option value portion of the warrant due to the requirement that the warrantholder exercise the warrant within 30 days of the event. The Black-Scholes model is an accepted pricing model for estimating fair market value where no quoted market price for an instrument is available.

The Public Warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and IAC. You should review a copy of the warrant agreement, which has been publicly filed with the SEC and which you can find in the list of exhibits to this registration statement, for a complete description of the terms and conditions applicable to the warrants. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding Public Warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of Public Warrants.

The Public Warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price (or on a cashless basis, if applicable), by certified or official bank check payable to us, for the number of warrants being exercised. The warrantholders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of Company common stock and any voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive shares of Company common stock. After the issuance of shares of Company common stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder will be entitled to one (1) vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders.

No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the Public Warrants. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number of shares of Company common stock to be issued to the warrantholder.

Table of Contents

Private Placement Warrants

The private placement warrants (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the private placement warrants) will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination (except, among other limited exceptions as described under “Principal Stockholders — Transfers of Founder Shares and Private Placement Warrants,” to our officers and directors and other persons or entities affiliated with the initial purchasers of the private placement warrants) and they will not be redeemable by us so long as they are held by the initial stockholders or their permitted transferees. The initial purchasers, or their permitted transferees, have the option to exercise the private placement warrants on a cashless basis. Except as described in this section, the private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those of the warrants being sold as part of the units in this offering. If the private placement warrants are held by holders other than the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees, the private placement warrants will be redeemable by us for cash and exercisable by the holders on the same basis as the warrants included in the units being sold in this offering.

If holders of the private placement warrants elect to exercise them on a cashless basis, they would pay the exercise price by surrendering his, her or its warrants for that number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” of our Class A common stock (defined below) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” will mean the average closing price of the Class A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of warrant exercise is sent to the warrant agent. The reason that we have agreed that these warrants will be exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees is because it is not known at this time whether they will be affiliated with us following a business combination. If they remain affiliated with us, their ability to sell our securities in the open market will be significantly limited. We expect to have policies in place that prohibit insiders from selling our securities except during specific periods of time. Even during such periods of time when insiders will be permitted to sell our securities, an insider cannot trade in our securities if he or she is in possession of material non-public information. Accordingly, unlike public stockholders who could exercise their warrants and sell the shares of Class A common stock received upon such exercise freely in the open market in order to recoup the cost of such exercise, the insiders could be significantly restricted from selling such securities. As a result, we believe that allowing the holders to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis is appropriate.

Our initial stockholders and the underwriters have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of the private placement warrants (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of any of these warrants) until the date that is 30 days after the date we complete our initial business combination, except that, among other limited exceptions, transfers can be made to our officers and directors and other persons or entities affiliated with the sponsor or the underwriters.

In addition, for as long as the private placement warrants are held by Cantor or Odeon or their respective designees or affiliates, they will be subject to the lock-up and registration rights limitations imposed by FINRA Rule 5110 and may not be exercised after five years from the commencement of sales of this offering.

Note Placement Warrants

Effective October 19, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with the Nancy Helen Wallace and Gerard Haase-Dubosc Family Trust (the “Haase-Dubosc Trust”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) a convertible promissory note to the Haase-Dubosc Trust in the original principal amount of $400,000 (the “Haase-Dubosc Note”), and (ii) warrants to the Haase-Dubosc Trust to purchase 363,636 shares of Company Class A common stock at an exercise price of $1.10/share (with an exercise term through October 15, 2030) (the “Haase-Dubosc Warrants”), for a total purchase price of $400,000. The Haase-Dubosc Note accrues interest at 7% per annum, matures on October 15, 2026, and is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at any time 6 months following issuance of the note at a fixed, non-variable conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day volume-weighted average price on the first trading day following issuance of the note, or $0.896/share. The Haase-Dubosc Note and Haase-Dubosc Warrants were issued to the Haase-Dubosc Trust on October 19, 2025.

Effective December 2, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with AIFirst Ventures LLC (“AIFirst”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) a convertible promissory note to AIFirst in the original principal amount of $250,000 (the “AIFirst Note”), and (ii) warrants to AIFirst to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Company Class A common stock at an exercise price of $1.00/share (the “AIFirst Warrants”), for a total purchase price of $250,000. The AIFirst Note does not accrue interest, matures on October 30, 2026, and is convertible into shares of Class A common stock of the Company at the election of the holder at any time 6 months following issuance of the note at a fixed, non-variable conversion price equal to 80% of the 5-day volume-weighted average price on the first trading day following issuance of the note (or $0.617, based on the 5-day volume-weighted average price on December 3, 2025, of approximately $0.771). The purchase price was paid by AIFirst to the Company on December 2, 2025, and the AIFirst Note and AIFirst Warrant were issued by the Company to AIFirst effective as of December 2, 2025.

Table of Contents

The Haase-Dubosc Warrants and AIFirst Warrants (collectively the “Note Placement Warrants”) are only exercisable for the exercise price payable in cash, and are not exercisable on a “cashless” basis. If the number of outstanding shares of our Company common stock is increased or decreased by a stock dividend, subdivision, stock split, consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of Company common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such event, (i) the exercise price shall be proportionately adjusted by the ratio which the total number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after such event bears to the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to such event, and (ii) the number of shares of Company common stock issuable on exercise of the Note Placement Warrants will be adjusted in proportion to such increase or decrease in outstanding shares of Company common stock.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial conditions. The payment of any cash dividends is within the discretion of our board of directors at such time. Further, if we incur any indebtedness, our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.

Our Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent

The transfer agent for our common stock and warrant agent for our warrants is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. We have agreed to indemnify Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company in its roles as transfer agent and warrant agent, its agents and each of its stockholders, directors, officers and employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity, except for any liability due to any gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith of the indemnified person or entity.

Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and the Amended and Restated Charter and Bylaws

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL regulating corporate takeovers. This statute prevents certain Delaware corporations, under certain circumstances, from engaging in a “business combination” with:

	●	a stockholder who owns 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding voting stock (otherwise known as an “interested stockholder”);

	●	an affiliate of an interested stockholder; or

	●	an associate of an interested stockholder, for three years following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder.

A “business combination” includes a merger or sale of the Company’s assets with a market value of 10% or more of its aggregate market value of all of its assets or of all of its outstanding stock. However, the above provisions of Section 203 do not apply if:

	●	the Company Board approves the transaction that made the stockholder an “interested stockholder,” prior to the date of the transaction;

	●	after the completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, that stockholder owned at least 85% of the Company’s voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, other than statutorily excluded shares of common stock; or

	●	on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the initial business combination is approved by the Company Board and authorized at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders, and not by written consent, by an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

Under certain circumstances, Section 203 of the DGCL will make it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with the Company for a three-year period. This provision may encourage companies interested in acquiring the Company to negotiate in advance with the Company Board because the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if the Company Board approves either the business combination or the transaction which results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. Section 203 of the DGCL also may have the effect of preventing changes in the Company Board and may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions which stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

The Amended and Restated Charter provided that the Company Board is classified into three classes of directors. As a result, in most circumstances, a person can gain control of the Company Board only by successfully engaging in a proxy contest at two or more annual meetings.

Table of Contents

Authorized but Unissued Shares

The Company’s authorized but unissued common stock and preferred stock are available for future issuances without stockholder approval (including a specified future issuance) and could be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future offerings to raise additional capital, acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of the Company by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Exclusive forum for certain lawsuits

The Amended and Restated Charter requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in the Company’s name, actions against any current or former directors, officers, employees or stockholders of the Company for breach of fiduciary duty and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware or if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, the federal district court of the State of Delaware. The Amended and Restated Charter also requires, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the federal district courts of the United States to be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act. Although we believe these provisions benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law in the types of lawsuits to which it applies, a court may determine that these provisions are unenforceable, and to the extent they are enforceable, the provisions may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against the Company’s directors and officers, although the Company stockholders will not be deemed to have waived the Company’s compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Special meeting of stockholders

The Bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by a resolution adopted by the Company Board.

Advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations

The Bylaws provide that stockholders seeking to bring business before the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate candidates for election as directors at Company’s annual meeting of stockholders, must provide timely notice of their intent in writing. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice will need to be received by the company secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 90^th day nor earlier than the opening of business on the 120^thday prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. Pursuant to Rule 14A-8 of the Exchange Act, proposals seeking inclusion in the Company’s annual proxy statement must comply with the notice periods contained therein. The Bylaws also specify certain requirements as to the form and content of a stockholders’ meeting. These provisions may preclude the Company’s stockholders from bringing matters before the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders or from making nominations for directors at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Action by Written Consent

Any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual and special meeting of stockholders may be taken only upon the vote of stockholders at an annual or special meeting duly noticed and called in accordance of the DGCL and may not be taken by written consent of the stockholders without a meeting.

Classified Board of Directors

The Company Board is divided into three classes, Class A, Class B and Class C, with members of each class serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, in most circumstances, a person can gain control of the Company Board only by successfully engaging in a proxy contest at two or more annual meetings. The Amended and Restated Charter and the Company’s Bylaws provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors. Subject to the terms of any preferred stock, any or all of the directors may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of holders of at least sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of Company capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. Any vacancy on the Company Board, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of the Company Board, may be filled only by vote of a majority of the Company’s directors then in office.

Listing of Securities

Our common stock and Public Warrants are currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “AMOD” and “AMODW,” respectively.

Table of Contents

Description of Warrants

The following description, together with the additional information we may include in any applicable prospectus supplements and free writing prospectuses, summarizes the material terms and provisions of the warrants that we may offer under this prospectus, which may consist of warrants to purchase common stock and may be issued in one or more series. Warrants may be issued independently or together with common stock offered by any prospectus supplement, and may be attached to or separate from such securities. While the terms we have summarized below will apply generally to any warrants that we may offer under this prospectus, we will describe the particular terms of any series of warrants that we may offer in more detail in the applicable prospectus supplement and any applicable free writing prospectus. The terms of any warrants offered under a prospectus supplement may differ from the terms described below. However, no prospectus supplement will fundamentally change the terms that are set forth in this prospectus or offer a security that is not registered and described in this prospectus at the time of its effectiveness.

We have filed forms of the warrant agreements and forms of warrant certificates containing the terms of the warrants being offered as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We will file as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, or will incorporate by reference from reports that we file with the SEC, the form of warrant agreement, if any, including a form of warrant certificate, that describes the terms of the particular series of warrants we are offering. The following summaries of material provisions of the warrants and the warrant agreements are subject to, and qualified in their entirety by reference to, all the provisions of the warrant agreement and warrant certificate applicable to the particular series of warrants that we may offer under this prospectus. We urge you to read the applicable prospectus supplements related to the particular series of warrants that we may offer under this prospectus, as well as any related free writing prospectuses, and the complete warrant agreements and warrant certificates that contain the terms of the warrants.

General

We will describe in the applicable prospectus supplement the terms relating to a series of warrants being offered, including:

●	the title of such securities;

●	the offering price or prices and aggregate number of warrants offered;

●	the currency or currencies for which the warrants may be purchased;

●	if applicable, the designation and terms of the securities with which the warrants are issued and the number of warrants issued with each such security or each principal amount of such security;

●	if applicable, the date on and after which the warrants and the related securities will be separately transferable;

●	if applicable, the minimum or maximum amount of such warrants which may be exercised at any one time;

●	the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the exercise of one warrant and the price at which, and the currency in which, these shares may be purchased upon such exercise;

●	the effect of any merger, consolidation, sale or other disposition of our business on the warrant agreements and the warrants;

●	the terms of any rights to redeem or call the warrants;

Table of Contents

●	the terms of any rights to force the exercise of the warrants;

●	any provisions for changes to or adjustments in the exercise price or number of securities issuable upon exercise of the warrants;

●	the dates on which the right to exercise the warrants will commence and expire;

●	the manner in which the warrant agreements and warrants may be modified;

●	a discussion of any material or special U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding or exercising the warrants;

●	the terms of the securities issuable upon exercise of the warrants; and

●	any other specific terms, preferences, rights or limitations of or restrictions on the warrants.

Before exercising their warrants, holders of warrants will not have any of the rights of holders of common stock purchasable upon such exercise, including the right to receive dividends, if any, or, payments upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up or to exercise voting rights, if any.

Exercise of Warrants

Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase the securities that we specify in the applicable prospectus supplement at the exercise price that we describe in the applicable prospectus supplement. Unless we otherwise specify in the applicable prospectus supplement, holders of the warrants may exercise the warrants at any time up to the specified time on the expiration date that we set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. After the close of business on the expiration date, unexercised warrants will become void.

Unless we otherwise specify in the applicable prospectus supplement, holders of the warrants may exercise the warrants by delivering the warrant certificate representing the warrants to be exercised together with specified information, and paying the required amount to the warrant agent in immediately available funds, as provided in the applicable prospectus supplement. We will set forth on the reverse side of the warrant certificate and in the applicable prospectus supplement the information that the holder of the warrant will be required to deliver to the warrant agent in connection with the exercise of the warrant.

Upon receipt of the required payment and the warrant certificate properly completed and duly executed at the corporate trust office of the warrant agent or any other office indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, we will issue and deliver the securities purchasable upon such exercise. If fewer than all of the warrants represented by the warrant certificate are exercised, then we will issue a new warrant certificate for the remaining amount of warrants. If we so indicate in the applicable prospectus supplement, holders of the warrants may surrender securities as all or part of the exercise price for warrants.

Governing Law

The warrants and warrant agreements, and any claim, controversy or dispute arising under or related to the warrants or warrant agreements, will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state as specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.

Enforceability of Rights by Holders of Warrants

Each warrant agent will act solely as our agent under the applicable warrant agreement and will not assume any obligation or relationship of agency or trust with any holder of any warrant. A single bank or trust company may act as warrant agent for more than one issue of warrants. A warrant agent will have no duty or responsibility in case of any default by us under the applicable warrant agreement or warrant, including any duty or responsibility to initiate any proceedings at law or otherwise, or to make any demand upon us. Any holder of a warrant may, without the consent of the related warrant agent or the holder of any other warrant, enforce by appropriate legal action its right to exercise, and receive the securities purchasable upon exercise of, its warrants.

Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF UNITS

We may issue units consisting of two or more of the securities described above, in any combination, including common stock and/or warrants in one or more series. The terms of these units will be set forth in a prospectus supplement. The description of the terms of these units in the related prospectus supplement will not be complete. You should refer to the applicable form of unit and unit agreement for complete information with respect to these units.

Legal Ownership of Securities

We can issue securities in registered form or in the form of one or more global securities. We describe global securities in greater detail below. We refer to those persons who have securities registered in their own names on the books that we or any applicable trustee or depositary maintain for this purpose as the “holders” of those securities. These persons are the legal holders of the securities. We refer to those persons who, indirectly through others, own beneficial interests in securities that are not registered in their own names, as “indirect holders” of those securities. As we discuss below, indirect holders are not legal holders, and investors in securities issued in book-entry form or in street name will be indirect holders.

Book-Entry Holders

We may issue securities in book-entry form only, as we will specify in the applicable prospectus supplement. This means securities may be represented by one or more global securities registered in the name of a financial institution that holds them as depositary on behalf of other financial institutions that participate in the depositary’s book-entry system. These participating institutions, which are referred to as participants, in turn, hold beneficial interests in the securities on behalf of themselves or their customers.

Only the person in whose name a security is registered is recognized as the holder of that security. Global securities will be registered in the name of the depositary or its participants. Consequently, for global securities, we will recognize only the depositary as the holder of the securities, and we will make all payments on the securities to the depositary. The depositary passes along the payments it receives to its participants, which in turn pass the payments along to their customers who are the beneficial owners. The depositary and its participants do so under agreements they have made with one another or with their customers; they are not obligated to do so under the terms of the securities.

As a result, investors in a global security will not own securities directly. Instead, they will own beneficial interests in a global security, through a bank, broker or other financial institution that participates in the depositary’s book-entry system or holds an interest through a participant. As long as the securities are issued in global form, investors will be indirect holders, and not legal holders, of the securities.

Street Name Holders

We may terminate a global security or issue securities in non-global form. In these cases, investors may choose to hold their securities in their own names or in “street name.” Securities held by an investor in street name would be registered in the name of a bank, broker or other financial institution that the investor chooses, and the investor would hold only a beneficial interest in those securities through an account he or she maintains at that institution.

For securities held in street name, we or any applicable trustee or depositary will recognize only the intermediary banks, brokers and other financial institutions in whose names the securities are registered as the holders of those securities, and we or any such trustee or depositary will make all payments on those securities to them. These institutions pass along the payments they receive to their customers who are the beneficial owners, but only because they agree to do so in their customer agreements or because they are legally required to do so. Investors who hold securities in street name will be indirect holders, not holders, of those securities.

Legal Holders

Our obligations, as well as the obligations of any applicable trustee or third party employed by us or a trustee, run only to the legal holders of the securities. We do not have obligations to investors who hold beneficial interests in global securities, in street name or by any other indirect means. This will be the case whether an investor chooses to be an indirect holder of a security or has no choice because we are issuing the securities only in global form.

Table of Contents

For example, once we make a payment or give a notice to the legal holder, we have no further responsibility for the payment or notice even if that legal holder is required, under agreements with its participants or customers or by law, to pass it along to the indirect holders but does not do so. Similarly, we may want to obtain the approval of the holders to amend an indenture, to relieve us of the consequences of a default or of our obligation to comply with a particular provision of an indenture, or for other purposes. In such an event, we would seek approval only from the legal holders, and not the indirect holders, of the securities. Whether and how the legal holders contact the indirect holders is up to the legal holders.

Special Considerations for Indirect Holders

If you hold securities through a bank, broker or other financial institution, either in book-entry form because the securities are represented by one or more global securities or in street name, you should check with your own institution to find out:

●	how it handles securities payments and notices;

●	whether it imposes fees or charges;

●	how it would handle a request for the holders’ consent, if ever required;

●	whether and how you can instruct it to send you securities registered in your own name so you can be a holder, if that is permitted in the future;

●	how it would exercise rights under the securities if there were a default or other event triggering the need for holders to act to protect their interests; and

●	if the securities are in book-entry form, how the depositary’s rules and procedures will affect these matters.

Global Securities

A global security is a security that represents one or any other number of individual securities held by a depositary. Generally, all securities represented by the same global securities will have the same terms.

Each security issued in book-entry form will be represented by a global security that we issue to, deposit with and register in the name of a financial institution or its nominee that we select. The financial institution that we select for this purpose is called the depositary. Unless we specify otherwise in the applicable prospectus supplement, DTC will be the depositary for all securities issued in book-entry form.

A global security may not be transferred to or registered in the name of anyone other than the depositary, its nominee or a successor depositary, unless special termination situations arise. We describe those situations below under “—Special Situations When a Global Security Will Be Terminated.” As a result of these arrangements, the depositary, or its nominee, will be the sole registered owner and legal holder of all securities represented by a global security, and investors will be permitted to own only beneficial interests in a global security. Beneficial interests must be held by means of an account with a broker, bank or other financial institution that in turn has an account with the depositary or with another institution that does. Thus, an investor whose security is represented by a global security will not be a legal holder of the security, but only an indirect holder of a beneficial interest in the global security.

If the prospectus supplement for a particular security indicates that the security will be issued as a global security, then the security will be represented by a global security at all times unless and until the global security is terminated. If termination occurs, we may issue the securities through another book-entry clearing system or decide that the securities may no longer be held through any book-entry clearing system.

Special Considerations for Global Securities

As an indirect holder, an investor’s rights relating to a global security will be governed by the account rules of the investor’s financial institution and of the depositary, as well as general laws relating to securities transfers. We do not recognize an indirect holder as a holder of securities and instead deal only with the depositary that holds the global security.

Table of Contents

If securities are issued only as global securities, an investor should be aware of the following:

●	an investor cannot cause the securities to be registered in his or her name, and cannot obtain non-global certificates for his or her interest in the securities, except in the special situations we describe below;

●	an investor will be an indirect holder and must look to his or her own bank or broker for payments on the securities and protection of his or her legal rights relating to the securities, as we describe above;

●	an investor may not be able to sell interests in the securities to some insurance companies and to other institutions that are required by law to own their securities in non-book-entry form;

●	an investor may not be able to pledge his or her interest in the global security in circumstances where certificates representing the securities must be delivered to the lender or other beneficiary of the pledge in order for the pledge to be effective;

●	the depositary’s policies, which may change from time to time, will govern payments, transfers, exchanges and other matters relating to an investor’s interest in the global security;

●	we and any applicable trustee have no responsibility for any aspect of the depositary’s actions or for its records of ownership interests in the global security, nor will we or any applicable trustee supervise the depositary in any way;

●	the depositary may, and we understand that DTC will, require that those who purchase and sell interests in the global security within its book-entry system use immediately available funds, and your broker or bank may require you to do so as well; and

●	financial institutions that participate in the depositary’s book-entry system, and through which an investor holds its interest in the global security, may also have their own policies affecting payments, notices and other matters relating to the securities.

There may be more than one financial intermediary in the chain of ownership for an investor. We do not monitor and are not responsible for the actions of any of those intermediaries.

Special Situations When a Global Security Will Be Terminated

In a few special situations described below, a global security will terminate and interests in it will be exchanged for physical certificates representing those interests. After that exchange, the choice of whether to hold securities directly or in street name will be up to the investor. Investors must consult their own banks or brokers to find out how to have their interests in securities transferred to their own names, so that they will be direct holders. We have described the rights of holders and street name investors above.

A global security will terminate when the following special situations occur:

●	if the depositary notifies us that it is unwilling, unable or no longer qualified to continue as depositary for that global security and we do not appoint another institution to act as depositary within 90 days;

●	if we notify any applicable trustee that we wish to terminate that global security; or

●	if an event of default has occurred with regard to securities represented by that global security and has not been cured or waived.

The applicable prospectus supplement may also list additional situations for terminating a global security that would apply only to the particular series of securities covered by the applicable prospectus supplement. When a global security terminates, the depositary, and neither we nor any applicable trustee, is responsible for deciding the names of the institutions that will be the initial direct holders.

Table of Contents

Plan of Distribution

We may sell the securities covered hereby from time to time pursuant to underwritten public offerings, direct sales to the public, negotiated transactions, block trades or a combination of these methods. A distribution of these securities offered by this prospectus may also be effected through the issuance of derivative securities, including without limitation, warrants. We may sell the securities to or through underwriters or dealers, through agents, or directly to one or more purchasers. We may distribute securities from time to time in one or more transactions:

●	at a fixed price or prices, which may be changed;

●	at market prices prevailing at the time of sale;

●	at prices related to such prevailing market prices; or

●	at negotiated prices.

We may also sell equity securities covered by this registration statement in an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) under the Securities Act. Such offering may be made into an existing trading market for such securities in transactions at other than a fixed price, either:

●	on or through the facilities of The Nasdaq Capital Market or any other securities exchange or quotation or trading service on which such securities may be listed, quoted or traded at the time of sale; and/or

●	to or through a market maker other than on The Nasdaq Capital Market or such other securities exchanges or quotation or trading services.

Such at-the-market offerings, if any, may be conducted by underwriters acting as principal or agent.

A prospectus supplement or supplements (and any related free writing prospectus that we may authorize to be provided to you) will describe the terms of the offering of the securities, including, to the extent applicable:

●	the name or names of any underwriters, dealers or agents, if any;

●	the purchase price of the securities and the proceeds we will receive from the sale;

●	any options pursuant to which underwriters may purchase additional securities from us;

●	any agency fees or underwriting discounts and other items constituting agents’ or underwriters’ compensation;

●	any public offering price;

●	any discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to dealers; and

●	any securities exchange or market on which the securities may be listed.

Only underwriters named in the prospectus supplement are underwriters of the securities offered by the prospectus supplement.

If underwriters are used in the sale, they will acquire the securities for their own account and may resell the securities from time to time in one or more transactions at a fixed public offering price or at varying prices determined at the time of sale. The obligations of the underwriters to purchase the securities will be subject to the conditions set forth in the applicable underwriting agreement. We may offer the securities to the public through underwriting syndicates represented by managing underwriters or by underwriters without a syndicate. Subject to certain conditions, the underwriters will be obligated to purchase all of the securities offered by the prospectus supplement, other than securities covered by any option to purchase additional securities. Any public offering price and any discounts or concessions allowed or reallowed or paid to dealers may change from time to time. We may use underwriters with whom we have a material relationship. We will describe in the prospectus supplement, naming the underwriter, the nature of any such relationship.

Table of Contents

We may sell securities directly or through agents we designate from time to time. We will name any agent involved in the offering and sale of securities, and we will describe any commissions and other compensation we will pay the agent in the prospectus supplement. Unless the prospectus supplement states otherwise, our agent will act on a best-efforts basis for the period of its appointment.

We may authorize agents or underwriters to solicit offers by certain types of institutional investors to purchase securities from us at the public offering price set forth in the prospectus supplement pursuant to delayed delivery contracts providing for payment and delivery on a specified date in the future. We will describe the conditions to these contracts and the commissions we must pay for solicitation of these contracts in the prospectus supplement.

We may provide agents and underwriters with indemnification against civil liabilities related to this offering, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or contribution with respect to payments that the agents or underwriters may make with respect to these liabilities. Agents and underwriters may engage in transactions with, or perform services for, us in the ordinary course of business.

All securities we may offer, other than common stock, will be new issues of securities with no established trading market. Any agents or underwriters may make a market in these securities, but will not be obligated to do so and may discontinue any market making at any time without notice. We cannot guarantee the liquidity of the trading markets for any securities. There is currently no market for any of the offered securities, other than our common stock which is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. We have no current plans for listing of the warrants on any securities exchange or quotation system; any such listing with respect to any particular series of warrants will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement or other offering materials, as the case may be.

Any underwriter may engage in overallotment, stabilizing transactions, short covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Overallotment involves sales in excess of the offering size, which create a short position. Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum. Short covering transactions involve purchases of the securities in the open market after the distribution is completed to cover short positions. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a dealer when the securities originally sold by the dealer are purchased in a stabilizing or covering transaction to cover short positions. Those activities may cause the price of the securities to be higher than it would otherwise be. If commenced, the underwriters may discontinue any of the activities at any time. These transactions may be effected on any exchange or over-the-counter market or otherwise.

Any agents and underwriters who are qualified market makers on The Nasdaq Capital Market may engage in passive market making transactions in the securities on The Nasdaq Capital Market in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M, during the business day prior to the pricing of the offering, before the commencement of offers or sales of the securities. Passive market makers must comply with applicable volume and price limitations and must be identified as passive market makers. In general, a passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid for such security; if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid, however, the passive market maker’s bid must then be lowered when certain purchase limits are exceeded. Passive market making may stabilize the market price of the securities at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

In compliance with the guidelines of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”), the aggregate maximum discount, commission, fees or other items constituting underwriting compensation to be received by any FINRA member or independent broker-dealer will not exceed 8% of the gross proceeds of any offering pursuant to this prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement.

If at the time of any offering made under this prospectus a member of FINRA participating in the offering has a “conflict of interest” as defined in FINRA Rule 5121 (“Rule 5121”), that offering will be conducted in accordance with the relevant provisions of Rule 5121.

Table of Contents

Legal Matters

Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, certain legal matters in connection with the offering and the validity of the securities offered by this prospectus, and any supplement thereto, will be passed upon by Brunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC.

Experts

The financial statements of Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. incorporated in this prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, have been so incorporated in reliance on the report (which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) of MaloneBailey, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

The financial statements of Alpha Modus Corp. incorporated in this prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, have been so incorporated in reliance on the report (which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) of Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P., an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

Where You Can Find More Information

This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits which are part of the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and the securities offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits filed as part of the registration statement. Neither we nor any agent, underwriter or dealer has authorized any person to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus is accurate on any date subsequent to the date set forth on the front of the document or that any information we have incorporated by reference is correct on any date subsequent to the date of the document incorporated by reference, even though this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus is delivered, or securities are sold, on a later date.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may obtain a copy of these filings at no cost by writing us at the following address: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc., 20311 Chartwell Center Dr., #1469, Cornelius, North Carolina 28031, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We also maintain a website at www.heatrecoverysolutions.com. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this prospectus.

Table of Contents

Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” into this prospectus the information we file with them, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. In accordance with Rule 412 of the Securities Act, any statement contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein, or in any subsequently filed document which also is incorporated by reference herein, modifies or supersedes such earlier statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this prospectus.

We incorporate by reference the documents listed below, as filed with the SEC on the dates listed below:

	(1)	Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed on April 15, 2025.
	(2)	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, filed on May 15, 2025.
	(3)	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, filed on August 12, 2025.
	(4)	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, filed on November 14, 2025.
	(5)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2024.
	(6)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2025.
	(7)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2025.
	(8)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2025.
	(9)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2025.
	(10)	Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 31, 2025.

We also incorporate by reference into this prospectus all documents (other than Current Reports furnished under Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of Form 8-K and exhibits filed on such form that are related to such items) that are subsequently filed by us with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act prior to the termination of the offering of the securities made by this prospectus (including documents filed after the date of the initial registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement).

You may request a copy of these filings at no cost, by contacting us at the following address or telephone number:

Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
20311 Chartwell Center Dr., #1469
Cornelius, North Carolina 28031
Attention: Corporate Secretary
(704) 252-5050

THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES OR ACCEPT AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 7, 2026

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

(To Prospectus dated [ ], 2026)

$3,500,000

Common Stock

We have entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”), dated as of January 7, 2026, with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (the “Sales Agent”), relating to the sale of shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. In accordance with the terms of the Sales Agreement, under this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus we may offer and sell shares of our common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, having an aggregate offering price of up to $3,500,000 from time to time through or to the Sales Agent.

Sales of our common stock, if any, under this prospectus supplement may be made by any method deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including, without limitation, sales made directly on or through the Nasdaq Capital Market, the existing trading market for our common stock, or any other existing trading market in the United States for our common stock, sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or otherwise, directly to the sales agent as principal, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, and/or in any other method permitted by law. The Sales Agent is not required to sell any specific amount of securities, but will act as our sales agents, using commercially reasonable efforts to sell on our behalf all of the shares of common stock requested to be sold by us, consistent with their normal trading and sales practices, on mutually agreed terms set forth in the Sales Agreement. There is no arrangement for funds to be received in any escrow, trust or similar arrangement.

The compensation to the Sales Agent for sales of common stock sold pursuant to the Sales Agreement is equal to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of the sales price per share. In connection with the sale of the common stock on our behalf, the Sales Agent will be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and the compensation of the Sales Agent will be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts. We have also agreed to provide indemnification and contribution to the Sales Agent with respect to certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

Pursuant to General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3, in no event will we sell our securities in a public primary offering with a value exceeding more than one-third of our public float in any 12-month period so long as our public float remains below $75.0 million. As of January 2, 2026, the aggregate market value of our outstanding common stock held by non-affiliates, or public float, was approximately $10,880,847, based on 10,169,016 shares of our outstanding common stock that were held by non-affiliates on such date and a price of $1.07 per share, which was the price at which our common stock was last sold on the Nasdaq Capital Market on November 10, 2025 (a date within 60 days of the date hereof), calculated in accordance with General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3. During the 12 calendar months prior to and including the date of this prospectus, we have not offered and sold any of our securities pursuant to General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Please read the information contained in and incorporated by reference under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-20 of this prospectus supplement, and under similar headings in the other documents that are filed after the date hereof and incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

H.C. Wainwright & Co.

The date of this prospectus supplement is [ ], 2026.

Table of Contents

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT	S-1
INTRODUCTORY NOTE AND FREQUENTLY USED TERMS	S-2
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY	S-3
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	S-6
ABOUT THE COMPANY	S-6
RISK FACTORS	S-20
USE OF PROCEEDS	S-22
DILUTION	S-23
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION	S-24
LEGAL MATTERS	S-25
EXPERTS	S-25
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	S-25
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE	S-26

Table of Contents

About This Prospectus SUPPLEMENT

This prospectus supplement relates to the offering of our common stock. Before buying any of the common stock that we are offering, we urge you to carefully read this prospectus supplement, together with the information incorporated by reference as described under the heading “Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference” in this prospectus supplement and the information in any free writing prospectus that we may authorize for use in connection with this offering. These documents contain important information that you should consider when making your investment decision.

This prospectus supplement describes the specific terms of the common stock we are offering and also adds to and updates information contained in the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement. To the extent there is a conflict between the information contained in this prospectus supplement, on the one hand, and the information contained in any document incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, before the date of this prospectus supplement, on the other hand, you should rely on the information in this prospectus supplement. If any statement in one of these documents is inconsistent with a statement in another document having a later date — for example, a document incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement — the statement in the document having the later date modifies or supersedes the earlier statement.

You should rely only on the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement and in any free writing prospectus that we may authorize for use in connection with this offering. We have not, and the Sales Agent have not, authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the Sales Agent are not, making an offer to sell or soliciting an offer to buy our common stock in any jurisdiction in which an offer or solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making that offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make an offer or solicitation. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus supplement, the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement, and in any free writing prospectus that we may authorize for use in connection with this offering, is accurate only as of the date of those respective documents. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since those dates. You should read this prospectus supplement, the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement, and any free writing prospectus that we may authorize for use in connection with this offering, in their entirety before making an investment decision. You should also read and consider the information in the documents to which we have referred you in the sections of this prospectus supplement entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” and “Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference.”

We further note that the representations, warranties and covenants made by us in any agreement that is filed as an exhibit to any document that is incorporated by reference in this prospectus were made solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement, including, in some cases, for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties to such agreements, and should not be deemed to be a representation, warranty or covenant to you. Moreover, such representations, warranties or covenants were accurate only as of the date when made. Accordingly, such representations, warranties and covenants should not be relied on as accurately representing the current state of our affairs.

This prospectus contains and incorporates by reference market data and industry statistics and forecasts that are based on independent industry publications and other publicly available information. Although we believe that these sources are reliable, we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information and we have not independently verified this information. Although we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the market and industry data presented in this prospectus and the documents incorporated herein by reference, these estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this prospectus and under similar headings in the other documents that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on this information.

S-1