STOCK TITAN

Statement from United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby

Rhea-AI Impact
(Moderate)
Rhea-AI Sentiment
(Positive)
Tags

United Airlines (NYSE: UAL) CEO Scott Kirby announced that he approached American Airlines about a potential merger but American declined to engage, ending talks on April 27, 2026. Kirby described the proposal as a growth-focused combination aimed at expanding international service, increasing economy seat supply, and creating U.S. jobs.

He cited metrics including 2025 ticket prices 29% below pre-pandemic, a 65% share of long-haul seats flown by foreign carriers, and a combined workforce he described as about 250,000 employees.

Loading...
Loading translation...

Positive

  • 2025 ticket prices were 29% cheaper than pre-pandemic levels
  • Proposal aimed to expand international and smaller-community service
  • Combined workforce described as about 250,000 employees
  • Potential to create tens of thousands of new unionized jobs

Negative

  • American Airlines publicly declined to engage; merger talks ended
  • Regulatory review would have required divestitures in some domestic markets
  • Proposal acknowledged likely skepticism from officials and media

Key Figures

Ticket prices vs pre-pandemic: 29% cheaper Foreign long-haul seat share: 65% Foreign customer share: 40% +5 more
8 metrics
Ticket prices vs pre-pandemic 29% cheaper 2025 ticket prices adjusted for inflation vs pre-pandemic
Foreign long-haul seat share 65% Share of long-haul seats into U.S. flown by foreign-flagged airlines
Foreign customer share 40% Portion of long-haul customers who are foreign citizens
Combined workforce 250,000 employees Existing employees at United and American referenced in merger discussion
United workforce 115,000 employees United professionals cited as executing current strategy
Securities Act 1933 Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 referenced in disclaimer
Exchange Act 1934 Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 referenced in disclaimer
Form references 10-K and 10-Q Cited as sources of detailed risk factors and MD&A

Market Reality Check

Price: $93.00 Vol: Volume 6,304,166 vs 20-da...
normal vol
$93.00 Last Close
Volume Volume 6,304,166 vs 20-day average 8,702,328 (relative volume 0.72) indicates subdued trading ahead of this statement. normal
Technical Price at $93.00, trading below 200-day MA of $100.71, about 21.99% below the 52-week high and 41.64% above the 52-week low.

Peers on Argus

UAL was up 1.92% while airlines were mixed: DAL -0.45%, LUV +3.76%, AAL +1.42%, ...

UAL was up 1.92% while airlines were mixed: DAL -0.45%, LUV +3.76%, AAL +1.42%, ALK -0.38%, CPA +0.82%. With no peers in the momentum scanner and a company-specific CEO statement on merger discussions, the move appears stock-specific rather than a broad sector rotation.

Historical Context

5 past events · Latest: Apr 21 (Positive)
Pattern 5 events
Date Event Sentiment Move Catalyst
Apr 21 Q1 2026 earnings Positive -6.8% Strong Q1 revenue, EPS and margins alongside updated capacity and fleet plans.
Apr 01 Earnings webcast notice Neutral +3.3% Announcement of timing and access details for Q1 2026 results webcast.
Apr 01 App feature launch Positive +3.3% Launch of TSA wait-time tracking pilot across major U.S. hubs in mobile app.
Mar 26 Labor agreement Neutral -0.3% Tentative flight attendant agreement raising pay and benefits for about 30,000 staff.
Mar 24 Product innovation Positive -0.4% Introduction of United Relax Row convertible couch seating on widebody aircraft.
Pattern Detected

Recent news shows mixed alignment: strong earnings and product/customer updates have sometimes seen negative or muted reactions, indicating that positive fundamentals do not consistently translate into short-term gains.

Recent Company History

Over the past months, United has focused on strengthening financial performance and customer experience. On Apr 21, 2026, it reported strong Q1 results with higher earnings and margins, yet the stock fell 6.82%. Earlier, product and customer-experience updates such as the TSA wait-time tracker and the United Relax Row, plus a large tentative agreement covering 30,000 flight attendants, produced only modest price moves. Against this backdrop, today’s CEO statement on unconsummated merger talks with American fits into a pattern where strategic and customer-focused initiatives do not always drive large immediate price reactions.

Market Pulse Summary

This announcement clarifies that discussions about a potential United–American merger did not progre...
Analysis

This announcement clarifies that discussions about a potential United–American merger did not progress, and United remains focused on its standalone growth strategy. The CEO emphasizes customer experience, network expansion, and U.S. competitiveness, while the extensive forward-looking statement disclaimer highlights numerous risks that could affect outcomes. In context of recent strong Q1 results and ongoing product and labor initiatives, investors may watch future disclosures on organic growth, regulatory environment, and capital and workforce plans for further signals.

Key Terms

forward-looking statements, form 10-k, form 10-q, risk factors
4 terms
forward-looking statements regulatory
"This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of Section 27A"
Forward-looking statements are predictions or plans that companies share about what they expect to happen in the future, like estimating sales or profits. They matter because they help investors understand a company's outlook, but since they are based on guesses and assumptions, they can sometimes be wrong.
form 10-k regulatory
"set forth in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" and in Part II, Item 7... of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K"
A Form 10-K is a comprehensive report that publicly traded companies are required to file annually with regulators. It provides a detailed overview of a company's financial health, operations, and risks, similar to a detailed health report. Investors use this information to assess the company's performance and make informed decisions about buying or selling its stock.
form 10-q regulatory
"and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026"
A Form 10-Q is a detailed report that publicly traded companies are required to file with regulators three times a year, providing an update on their financial health and business activities. It is important for investors because it offers timely insights into a company's performance, helping them make informed decisions about buying or selling stocks. Think of it as a regular check-up report that shows how well a company is doing.
risk factors regulatory
"due to numerous factors including, without limitation, any risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors""
Risk factors are elements or conditions that could cause an investment's value to decrease or lead to potential losses. They are like warning signs or obstacles that can affect the success of an investment, making it uncertain or more unpredictable. Recognizing risk factors helps investors understand the possible challenges and make more informed decisions.

AI-generated analysis. Not financial advice.

CHICAGO, April 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Over the last two weeks, there's been a lot of commentary about a potential merger between United Airlines and American Airlines. And to be direct, here's what happened: I approached American about exploring a combination because I thought we could do something incredible for customers together. I always knew that the only way any merger could be successful (and approved) is if it was great for customers and with a willing partner that shared my big, bold vision. I was confident that this combination, which would have been about adding and not subtracting, creating a truly great airline that customers love, could get regulatory approval. I was hoping to pitch that story to American, but they declined to engage and instead responded by publicly closing the door. And without a willing partner, something this big simply can't get done.

In the past, airline mergers usually have been about two struggling airlines coming together to cut costs, flights and headcount. My aspirations could not be more different. The bold idea I wanted to pursue was about growth that would usher in a brand new era of leadership by U.S. aviation. After all, flight was born here and the storied names of the past, including both United and American, set the standards that the rest of the world aspired to. By combining our airlines and using that scale to revolutionize our customers' experience, we'd create a new, thriving U.S. airline that would be the very best in the world for customers – full stop.

While American's public comments make it clear that a merger like this is off the table for the foreseeable future, I do think it's worth taking the time to describe in some more detail what this could have looked like.

To start, it's clear the strategy United has been implementing over the last several years is winning: building a brand loyal airline by de-commoditizing travel, investing in the customer experience and creating value for every customer no matter where they are sitting.

In the simplest terms, combining United and American could: 1) scale and grow that winning, customer-focused approach, 2) unlock incredible, new opportunities for both airlines' customers, employees and the communities we serve and 3) create a great, new U.S. airline with the scale to compete and lead around the globe.

Here are some of the benefits the combination could produce:
Fly an airline that customers love to even more places: United is already changing what it means to be an airline by having the best service, technology, reliability, and products – for every customer – so that flying on United feels better than other airlines. And, we have big plans to do even more. Bringing those benefits to even more people gives customers of both airlines more choice and more value, including best-in-class products, technology and experiences as well as a more valuable loyalty and rewards program that offers more opportunities to earn and use miles. The combined airline would have been about growth – especially internationally and with expanded service to smaller communities – both of which are mathematically enabled by having a larger network.

Create even more value: Price and affordability are important, but unless you think air travel is just a commodity, 'value' matters too. The truth is that in 2025 ticket prices were 29% cheaper than they were pre-pandemic (adjusted for inflation). And in that time, United has focused on providing ever more value to customers by investing in our product: newer, more modern aircraft with bigger bins, screens in every seat, Bluetooth connectivity, free Starlink Wi-Fi and an award-winning mobile app, just to name a few things. A merger of United and American (and the growth that would have come with it) would have dramatically increased the total number of economy seats in the marketplace, offering cost-conscious customers more affordable ways to fly to more places and greater choices across all price points, while still delivering industry-best value to all customers. We wouldn't propose a combination that would cause prices to rise for customers.

Create a truly globally competitive airline – based in the U.S.: Today, there's a big trade deficit with foreign flagged airlines – they fly about 65% of the long haul seats into our country even though only 40% of the customers are foreign citizens – and the combined scale of United and American would be a better way to compete with foreign carriers. A larger US global airline would deliver U.S. jobs and economic opportunities.  This U.S. airline would set the standard for the next century just like U.S. airlines used to in the first century of passenger flight. And this would be a great U.S. airline that is the best, whether you're a customer from Chicago, Des Moines or Dubai.

Boost the U.S. economy, create millions of jobs and revitalize and strengthen the U.S. aircraft manufacturing industry: America is stronger when U.S. carriers flow more of the dollars of U.S. consumers to communities, employees and manufacturing right here at home. A combined company would have created tens of thousands of new high paying, unionized jobs with great benefits which would have led to even more career growth opportunities for the 250,000 employees already at United and American. Plus, the combined airline's need for new aircraft would have supported American manufacturing and domestic supply chains and driven even more job creation. And by flying more seats to more places in the U.S., this merger would boost local tourism and business travel, generating billions of dollars in U.S. economic activity and even more jobs.

I recognized from the beginning that a merger this big in our industry would attract a lot of skepticism in the media, including from some government officials. Since previous mergers have been about saving struggling airlines, previous legal and regulatory reviews have always focused on subtraction and what's being lost. But, a different kind of merger proposal – one that's focused on growth, customer investments and global competitiveness – would have been a different proposition altogether. And, while divestitures in certain domestic markets obviously would have been required, I believe regulators would have approved such a deal because they would have recognized the benefits to customers, our shared employees and communities from coast-to-coast and around the world.

While our pursuit of talks with American have ended, our mission to build the greatest airline in the history of aviation at United is well underway. We have a winning strategy, a culture of innovation and 115,000 of the best aviation professionals in the world working together to deliver for our customers. While the airline industry has always been dynamic and unpredictable (it's one of the reasons that I love this business), United's future is brighter than it's ever been.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements," within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to, among other things, the strategic and growth plans of United Airlines Holdings, Inc. ("UAL") and its subsidiary, United Airlines, Inc. (together with UAL, the "Company"); the Company's operational, financial, competitive and product positioning; the Company's workforce; possible transactions involving the Company; the Company's objectives, conditions, or requirements for any such possible transaction; the Company's potential counterparties for any such transaction; the potential risks, benefits or outcomes of any such possible transaction for the Company, the Company's customers, employees, community partners, suppliers or any other stakeholders, the airline industry and the economy; and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Such statements involve inherent risks, assumptions and uncertainties, known or unknown, including internal or external factors that could delay, divert or change any of them, that are difficult to predict, may be beyond the Company's control and could cause the Company's future financial results, goals, plans, commitments, strategies and objectives to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. Words such as "should," "could," "would," "will," "may," "expects," "plans," "intends," "anticipates," "indicates," "remains," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "forecast," "guidance," "outlook," "goals," "targets," "pledge," "confident," "optimistic," "dedicated," "positioned," "on track", "path" and other words and terms of similar meaning and expression are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such terms. All statements, other than those that relate solely to historical facts, are forward-looking statements.

Additionally, forward-looking statements include conditional statements and statements that identify uncertainties or trends, discuss the possible future effects of known trends or uncertainties, or that indicate that the future effects of known trends or uncertainties cannot be predicted, guaranteed or assured. All forward-looking statements in this press release are based upon information available to the Company on the date of this press release. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise, except as required by applicable law or regulation.

The Company's actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements due to numerous factors including, without limitation, any risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" and in Part II, Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, filed on February 12, 2026, and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026, filed on April 22, 2026, as well as other risks and uncertainties set forth from time to time in the reports the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/statement-from-united-airlines-ceo-scott-kirby-302754152.html

SOURCE United Airlines

FAQ

What did United (UAL) announce about a possible merger with American Airlines on April 27, 2026?

United said it approached American to explore a merger but American declined to engage, ending talks on April 27, 2026. According to the company, the proposal was framed as a growth-focused combination intended to expand international and domestic service.

How would a United and American merger have affected ticket supply and pricing for UAL shareholders?

The company said the combined airline would increase total economy seats and offer more affordable options for customers. According to the company, growth was expected to expand seat supply while preserving value across price points.

What job and manufacturing effects did United claim the UAL merger could produce?

United said the combination would create tens of thousands of new high-paying, unionized jobs and support U.S. aircraft manufacturing. According to the company, increased aircraft demand would benefit domestic supply chains and local economies.

Did United (UAL) claim the merger would raise fares for customers?

United stated the proposed combination would not cause prices to rise for customers and emphasized increased affordability. According to the company, ticket price declines and added seat supply would support lower-cost options.

Why did United (UAL) say regulators might approve a merger with American Airlines?

United argued regulators would consider customer, employee and community benefits and required divestitures in some markets. According to the company, the growth-focused rationale differed from past, cost-cutting merger reviews.