MGNI Form 4: Insider Sell-to-Cover 2,961 Shares; 120,569 Held After Sale
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Magnite insider sale to cover taxes: Chief Accounting Officer Brian Gephart reported a non-discretionary sale of 2,961 shares of Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) on 08/18/2025 at $23.85 per share to satisfy tax withholding tied to the settlement of vested Restricted Stock Units. After the transaction, the reporting person beneficially owned 120,569 shares, held directly. The filing states the sale was mandated by the issuer's sell-to-cover election and was not a discretionary trade by the reporting person. The Form 4 was executed by an attorney-in-fact and contains no derivative transactions or other purchases.
Positive
- Transparent disclosure of the reason for the sale (sell-to-cover of vested RSUs), which clarifies the transaction was non-discretionary
- Reporting person retains a substantive stake with 120,569 shares after the sale, indicating continued alignment with shareholders
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR Insider sold a small block of shares to satisfy tax withholding from vested RSUs; transaction appears routine and non-discretionary.
This Form 4 reports a modest sale of 2,961 common shares at $23.85 to cover tax obligations from vested restricted stock units. The seller is the Chief Accounting Officer and retained 120,569 shares post-transaction. The filing explicitly states the sale was mandated by the issuer's sell-to-cover policy and was not discretionary, which typically reduces signaling value to the market. No options, grants, or derivative transactions are reported, and the disclosure was signed by an attorney-in-fact.
TL;DR Transaction aligns with standard payroll withholding on RSU settlement and raises no governance concerns from the filing details.
The filing documents a common administrative action: shares sold to satisfy tax withholding at RSU vesting. The reporting person remains a significant shareholder with 120,569 shares. The clear explanation that the sale was mandated by company policy supports compliance with Rule 10b5-1 disclosure norms and reduces the likelihood this trade reflects private material information. The absence of amendments, derivatives, or coordinated transfers suggests routine handling of equity compensation obligations.