Magnite Files Lawsuit Against Google
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), the largest independent sell-side advertising company, has filed a lawsuit against Google in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The legal action follows an April 2025 court ruling that found Google had illegally maintained monopoly power in ad exchange and ad server markets.
The lawsuit seeks financial damages and remedies, with Magnite's complaint detailing Google's exclusionary practices that allegedly prevented fair competition in open-web display advertising for over a decade. CEO Michael Barrett emphasized the company's mission to help publishers maximize advertising yield and criticized Google's practices for harming the open web ecosystem.
Magnite is being represented by Kressin Powers LLC in this significant antitrust litigation.Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), la maggiore azienda indipendente di pubblicità dal lato venditore, ha intentato una causa contro Google presso il U.S. District Court per il Eastern District of Virginia. L’azione legale segue una sentenza del tribunale di aprile 2025 che ha rilevato che Google aveva mantenuto illegalmente potere di monopolio nei mercati di scambio pubblicitario e di server pubblicitari.
La causa punta a danni finanziari e rimedi, con l’esposto di Magnite che dettaglia pratiche esclusionarie di Google che, secondo quanto dichiarato, hanno ostacolato una concorrenza leale nella pubblicità display sull’open web per oltre un decennio. Il CEO Michael Barrett ha sottolineato la missione dell’azienda di aiutare gli editori a massimizzare il rendimento pubblicitario e ha criticato le pratiche di Google per danneggiare l’ecosistema del web aperto.
Magnite è rappresentata da Kressin Powers LLC in questa rilevante controversia antitrust.
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), la mayor empresa independiente de publicidad en el lado de la venta, ha interpuesto una demanda contra Google en el U.S. District Court del Distrito Este de Virginia. La acción legal sigue a una sentencia de abril de 2025 que encontró que Google había mantenido ilegalmente poder de monopolio en los mercados de intercambio de anuncios y de servidores de anuncios.
La demanda busca daños y remedios financieros, con la denuncia de Magnite detallando prácticas excluyentes de Google que supuestamente impidieron una competencia justa en la publicidad gráfica de la web abierta durante más de una década. El CEO Michael Barrett enfatizó la misión de la empresa de ayudar a los editores a maximizar el rendimiento publicitario y criticó las prácticas de Google por perjudicar el ecosistema de la web abierta.
Magnite está siendo representada por Kressin Powers LLC en esta importante litigar antimonopolio.
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), 판매 측 광고 분야에서 가장 큰 독립 기업은 Google를 미국 버지니아 주 동부 지구 법원(The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia)에 고소했습니다. 이번 소송은 2025년 4월 법원 판결에서 구글이 광고 거래 및 광고 서버 시장에서 불법적으로 독점 권력을 유지했다고 판시한 뒤 제기되었습니다.
소송은 재정적 손해 배상 및 구제를 요구하며, Magnite의 불만서는 Google의 배타적(배타적) 관행이 오픈 웹 디스플레이 광고의 공정 경쟁을 10년 이상 방해했다고 상세히 밝히고 있습니다. CEO Michael Barrett는 게시자가 광고 수익을 극대화하도록 돕는 회사의 사명을 강조하고 오픈 웹 생태계에 해를 주는 Google의 관행을 비판했습니다.
Magnite는 이 중요한 반트러스트 소송에서 Kressin Powers LLC의 대리 하에 있습니다.
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), la plus grande entreprise indépendante de publicité côté vendeur, a intenté une action contre Google devant le U.S. District Court pour le Eastern District of Virginia. Cette action fait suite à une décision de justice d'avril 2025 qui a estimé que Google avait conservé illégalement un pouvoir monopolistique sur les marchés des échanges publicitaires et des serveurs publicitaires.
L'action vise des dommages financiers et des recours, le recours de Magnite détaillant des pratiques exclusives de Google qui auraient empêché une concurrence loyale dans la publicité display sur le web ouvert pendant plus d'une décennie. Le PDG Michael Barrett a souligné la mission de l'entreprise d'aider les éditeurs à maximiser leur rendement publicitaire et a critiqué les pratiques de Google qui, selon lui, nuisent à l'écosystème du web ouvert.
Magnite est représentée par Kressin Powers LLC dans ce litige antitrust important.
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), das größte unabhängige Sell-Side-Werbeunternehmen, hat eine Klage gegen Google vor dem U.S. District Court für den Eastern District of Virginia eingereicht. Die rechtliche Maßnahme folgt auf eine Gerichtsentscheidung im April 2025, die feststellte, dass Google seine monopolistische Marktmacht in den Bereichen Ad-Exchange und Ad-Server unrechtmäßig ausgeübt hat.
Die Klage strebt finanzielle Schadensersatzforderungen und Rechtsbehelfe an, wobei Magnites Beschwerde die ausgrenzenden Praktiken von Google detailliert darlegt, die laut Behauptung mehr als ein Jahrzehnt lang faire Konkurrenz in der Open-Web-Display-Werbung behindert haben. CEO Michael Barrett betonte die Mission des Unternehmens, Verlegern zu helfen, die Werbeeinnahmen zu maximieren, und kritisierte Googles Praktiken, die dem Open-Web-Ökosystem schaden würden.
Magnite wird in diesem bedeutenden Antitrust-Verfahren von Kressin Powers LLC vertreten.
Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI)، أكبر شركة مستقلة في مجال الإعلان من جهة البيع، قد رفعت دعوى قضائية ضد Google أمام محكمة الولايات المتحدة الاتحادية في المنطقة الشرقية بولاية فرجينيا. تأتي هذه الدعوى عقب حكم قضائي في أبريل 2025 الذي وجد أن Google حافظت بشكل غير قانوني على قوة احتكار في أسواق تبادل الإعلانات وخوادم الإعلانات.
تسعى الدعوى إلى تعويضات مالية وسبل إنصاف، حيث تفصّل شكوى Magnite ممارسات Google الاستثنائية التي يزعم أنها منعَت المنافسة العادلة في إعلانات العرض عبر الويب المفتوح لأكثر من عقد من الزمان. الرئيس التنفيذي مايكل باريت أكّد مهمة الشركة في مساعدة الناشرين على تعظيم عائداتهم الإعلانية وانتقد ممارسات Google التي تضر بنظام الويب المفتوح.
Magnite ممثلة من قبل شركة Kressin Powers LLC في هذه الدعوى المضادة للممارسات الاحتكارية الهامة.
Magnite（NASDAQ:MGNI），全球最大的独立卖方广告公司，已在美国弗吉尼亚州东部地区联邦法院对谷歌提起诉讼。此举紧随2025年4月法院裁决，认定谷歌在广告交易所和广告服务器市场非法维持垄断地位。
诉讼寻求经济赔偿和救济，Magnite的起诉书详细描述了谷歌的排他性做法，据称在十多年里阻碍了开放网络展示广告的公平竞争。首席执行官迈克尔·巴雷特强调公司帮助出版商最大化广告收益的使命，并批评谷歌的做法损害了开放网络生态系统。
Magnite在这起重要的反垄断诉讼中由Kressin Powers LLC代理。
- Potential for financial compensation if lawsuit is successful
- Legal action builds on previous favorable court ruling against Google from April 2025
- Opportunity to challenge anticompetitive practices and potentially gain fairer market access
- Legal proceedings could be lengthy and costly
- Uncertain outcome of the litigation
- Continued market challenges while lawsuit proceeds
Insights
Magnite's lawsuit against Google follows a favorable ruling and could yield substantial damages, but faces uncertain timeline and outcome.
This lawsuit represents a significant follow-on private litigation that leverages the April 2025 ruling where a federal court found Google had "willfully engaged in anticompetitive acts" to monopolize ad exchange and server markets. This ruling gives Magnite substantial legal footing.
The Eastern District of Virginia venue selection is strategic - this court is known as the "rocket docket" for its expedited case handling, suggesting Magnite wants quick resolution. However, antitrust cases typically involve complex discovery and can still stretch for years.
Magnite's claims focus on two key anticompetitive behaviors: forced publisher lock-in to Google's ad server and self-preferencing within its exchange. Following the government's successful case, Magnite need only prove damages rather than re-establishing liability, significantly lowering their litigation burden.
The retained counsel, Kressin Powers LLC, appears to be a specialized firm for this matter. Private antitrust litigation can yield treble damages (three times actual damages), making potential recovery substantial if Magnite can demonstrate lost business opportunities and revenue over the alleged monopolization period.
While the earlier government victory creates favorable conditions, Google will likely mount a vigorous defense, potentially arguing that Magnite's business challenges stemmed from market factors or execution rather than anticompetitive conduct.
This lawsuit represents a potential significant financial catalyst for Magnite. As the largest independent sell-side advertising platform, Magnite directly competes with Google's ad exchange services, and has allegedly suffered substantial revenue suppression from Google's anticompetitive practices.
The April 2025 ruling provides crucial legal leverage that substantially increases Magnite's chances of securing meaningful financial damages. In ad tech markets worth tens of billions annually, even a small market share shift from Google's alleged misconduct could translate to material damages when calculated over the multi-year period of monopolization.
Importantly, this case addresses core issues in Magnite's business model - specifically how Google allegedly steered publisher inventory to its own exchange and away from competitors like Magnite through its dominant ad server position. This created an artificial ceiling on Magnite's market penetration regardless of their technology quality or pricing.
Beyond potential damages, a favorable outcome could permanently improve Magnite's competitive position by removing structural disadvantages in the ad tech stack. This would allow Magnite to compete on a more level playing field going forward, potentially increasing market share, revenue growth rates, and profit margins.
While litigation costs will create some near-term expense pressure, the asymmetric risk-reward profile appears favorable given the existing court finding of Google's monopolistic behavior. The market will likely view this as a net positive development with limited downside risk and substantial upside potential over a multi-year horizon.
Seeks Damages and Other Remedies Relating to Unlawful Monopoly in Ad Tech Following U.S. District Court Ruling
NEW YORK, Sept. 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), the largest independent sell-side advertising company, announced that it had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Google seeking financial damages and other remedies, in light of the April 2025 U.S. District Court’s ruling, which found Google had "willfully engaged in a series of anticompetitive acts to acquire and maintain monopoly power" in the ad exchange and ad server markets.
Google’s dominance of open-web display advertising has stifled growth, innovation, and investment in the industry for more than a decade. Magnite’s complaint outlines Google’s exclusionary scheme to lock publishers into its ad server and to preference its own exchange. That conduct ultimately deprived Magnite and other independent players the opportunity to compete fairly and grow their businesses, while harming publishers and advertisers alike.
“Magnite was founded to help publishers thrive by maximizing their advertising yield through innovative technology, trusted guidance, and a transparent marketplace that efficiently connects them to buyers,” said Michael Barrett, CEO of Magnite. “For years, Google undermined our ability to execute on this mission with practices that favored its own business over the health of the open web, causing harm to publishers, advertisers, and partners like us. We look forward to a future that promotes healthy competition, ongoing innovation, and value creation for the ecosystem as a whole.”
Magnite is represented in this litigation by Kressin Powers LLC. The full complaint is available here.
About Magnite
We’re Magnite (NASDAQ: MGNI), the world’s largest independent sell-side advertising company. Publishers use our technology to monetize their content across all screens and formats including CTV, online video, display, and audio. The world’s leading agencies and brands trust our platform to access brand-safe, high-quality ad inventory and execute billions of advertising transactions each month. Anchored in bustling New York City, sunny Los Angeles, mile high Denver, historic London, colorful Singapore, and down under in Sydney, Magnite has offices across North America, EMEA, LATAM, and APAC.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements concerning the Company’s action against Google and the outcome of that action. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from expectations or results projected or implied by forward-looking statements, including factors identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in filings we have made and will make from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as required by law, the company disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
Media Contact:
Charlstie Veith
cveith@magnite.com
Investor Contact:
Nick Kormeluk
nkormeluk@magnite.com
FAQ
Why did Magnite (MGNI) file a lawsuit against Google in September 2025?
What specific allegations has Magnite made against Google in its 2025 lawsuit?
Who is representing Magnite (MGNI) in the 2025 antitrust lawsuit against Google?
What potential impact could the Magnite vs Google lawsuit have on the advertising industry?
What did the April 2025 U.S. District Court ruling determine about Google's market practices?
