[Form 4] QuickLogic Corp Insider Trading Activity
Andrew J. Pease, a director of QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK), was granted 5,246 restricted stock units (RSUs) on 09/02/2025. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of common stock and the RSUs have an exercise/price of $0. The award vests in full one year from the grant date, and following the reported transaction Mr. Pease beneficially owns 5,246 shares directly. The Form 4 was signed by an attorney-in-fact on 09/04/2025. The filing discloses a standard director equity award with no cash consideration reported.
- Director alignment: Grant of 5,246 RSUs aligns the director's interests with shareholders through equity compensation.
- Standard vesting: One-year vesting encourages continued service and retention without immediate dilution.
- Potential dilution: Issuance of 5,246 shares will increase outstanding shares when RSUs vest, though amount appears modest.
- No cash consideration: Awarded at $0 price increases share count without direct cash inflow to the company.
Insights
TL;DR: Routine director equity grant that aligns a director's interests with shareholders; modest in size and standard vesting.
The reported grant of 5,246 RSUs to a company director is a common governance practice to align board members with shareholder outcomes. The RSUs carry a $0 price and vest in one year, which encourages continued service for the next 12 months. For a governance review, this is a typical, non-extraordinary compensation action and does not on its face indicate change in control, acceleration provisions, or immediate dilution beyond the eventual issuance of shares at vesting.
TL;DR: Administrative insider filing documenting a compensatory equity grant; unlikely to materially affect capital structure.
From a securities perspective, the Form 4 documents a compensatory RSU award of 5,246 shares at $0 with a one-year vesting schedule. The amount is discrete and reported as direct beneficial ownership post-grant. There is no cash transaction, no derivative exercise, and no indication of additional related-party transfers. Given the size disclosed and lack of cash proceeds or complex derivative features, this transaction is routine and not expected to be material to valuation or liquidity.