GoPro Insider Filing: Woodman Cancels 9,192 Shares to Cover RSU Taxes
Rhea-AI Filing Summary
Nicholas Woodman, listed as Director, CEO and 10% owner of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO), reported a Form 4 transaction dated 08/15/2025. The filing discloses a disposition of 9,192 shares of Class A common stock at $1.35 per share under code F(1). The explanation states this was an exempt transaction pursuant to Section 16b-3(e), where shares were relinquished and cancelled by the issuer to satisfy federal and state tax withholding obligations arising from the vesting of restricted stock units; the reporting person did not sell shares for any other reason. After the transaction, the filing shows 812,102 shares beneficially owned (direct). The Form 4 is signed by an attorney-in-fact on 08/19/2025.
Positive
- Transaction is exempt and administrative: the filing states the disposal was solely to satisfy tax withholding for vested RSUs under Section 16b-3(e).
- Substantial ongoing ownership: the reporting person retains 812,102 shares following the transaction, indicating continued alignment with shareholders.
Negative
- None.
Insights
TL;DR: A routine tax-withholding share cancellation following RSU vesting; no cash sale or change in control indicated.
The Form 4 records a non-economic disposal of 9,192 Class A shares at $1.35 to cover tax obligations tied to vested RSUs. Such transactions are commonly executed under Section 16b-3(e) and do not reflect active monetization by the insider. The reporting person retains a substantial direct stake of 812,102 shares, indicating ongoing ownership alignment. Absent additional transactions or disclosures, this filing is operational and not value-driving.
TL;DR: Disclosure meets Rule 16 reporting for an exempt tax-withholding disposition; governance implications are minimal.
The filing transparently documents that shares were relinquished and cancelled by the issuer to satisfy tax withholding from RSU vesting, consistent with accepted Rule 16 practices. The use of an attorney-in-fact signature is properly noted. There is no indication of change in leadership, control, or an atypical related-party transaction. This is a routine equity-compensation administrative action.