[Form 4] Velo3D, Inc. Insider Trading Activity
Velo3D, Inc. director Adrian Keppler was granted 12,752 restricted stock units (RSUs) on 06/27/2025. Each RSU converts into one share of common stock for no consideration upon settlement. The RSUs vest 25% quarterly beginning 06/27/2025, with subsequent vesting on 09/27/2025, 12/27/2025 and 03/27/2025, subject to continued service. The filing notes a 1-for-15 reverse stock split effected by the issuer on 07/25/2025 and reflects the post-split share amounts. The Form 4 was signed by an attorney-in-fact on behalf of Mr. Keppler on 09/23/2025.
- 12,752 RSUs granted to a director, aligning management incentives with shareholders
- Clear vesting schedule (25% quarterly beginning 06/27/2025) provides transparency on when equity vests
- Form 4 discloses reverse split (1-for-15 on 07/25/2025), clarifying post-split share counts
- None.
Insights
TL;DR A routine director equity award aligns executive incentives; vesting schedule is standard service-based RSUs.
The grant of 12,752 RSUs to a director represents a non-cash, service-conditioned equity award designed to align the reporting person with shareholder interests. The 25% quarterly vesting starting immediately on 06/27/2025 indicates an accelerated or front-loaded schedule compared with typical annual or multi-year cliff vesting, which can modestly enhance near-term retention incentives. The notation of a 1-for-15 reverse split is a corporate action that adjusted reported share counts and should be considered when comparing historical ownership levels. Overall, this disclosure is routine and not materially dilutive on its own.
TL;DR Governance-wise this is a standard director compensation disclosure with clear vesting terms and post-split accounting.
The Form 4 cleanly documents the nature and timing of the equity award and the service-based vesting schedule. Use of RSUs that settle for no consideration is a common practice for directors. The explicit vesting dates and the statement that settlement is contingent on continued service provide transparency for investors reviewing insider incentives. The attorney-in-fact signature is properly disclosed, indicating delegated filing authority. There are no governance red flags in the filing itself.